Cited by 456Geological and Geochemical AnalysisAnalytical chemistry methods developmentGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Determination of molybdenum isotope fractionation by double-spike multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Open access
Siebert, Christopher, Nägler, Thomas F., Kramers, Jan D.·2001·Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems

Abstract

Molybdenum isotopic compositions are precisely determined by MC‐ICP‐MS measurements using a Mo double spike. The double spike is added prior to chemical purification, so that laboratory and instrumental mass fractionations are separated from natural mass‐dependent fractionation. Fractionation is determined on four Mo mass ratios, providing an internal consistency check. The external standard reproducibility is at 0.06 per mil on the 98Mo/95Mo ratio (2 standard deviation)). Using a normal microconcentric nebuliser with a cyclonic spray chamber, the minimum quantity of Mo is ∼1 μg for high‐precision results. A hydrothermal molybdenite shows fractionation of −0.3 per mil on the 98Mo/95Mo ratio relative to our standard (Johnson Matthey, 1000 μg/mL (±0.3%) ICP standard solution, lot 602332B). Fine‐grained sediments show fractionation of 0.1 and −0.3 per mil on the 98Mo/95Mo ratio. The observed Mo isotope fractionation is small but resolvable with the presented high‐resolution technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000gc000124

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Parrington, J. R., H. D. Knox, S. L. Brenemann, E. M. Baum, and F. Feiner (Eds.), Nuclides and Isotopes, Chart of the Nuclides, 64 pp., KAPL Inc., Lockheed

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siebert, C., Nägler, T. F., & Kramers, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Siebert, Christopher
  • Nägler, Thomas F.
  • Kramers, Jan D.
Venue
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Published
2001-07
Volume
2
Issue
7
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524978295
Cited by
456
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
molybdenum isotopes, isotope fractionation, double-spike method, multi-collector ICP-MS, mass-dependent fractionation, molybdenite, nebulizer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review