The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories
Pisoni, D. B., & Tash, J. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213946 · Cited by 418
Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT
Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., & Viemeister, N. F. (1977) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.381590 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.
Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.357 · Cited by 686
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003 · Cited by 654
Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006 · Cited by 531
PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216 · Cited by 484
Hearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception
Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2007) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.014 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- B33-B42
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119871874
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00157-9
- The paper
- McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00157-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
