Cited by 418Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionReading and Literacy Development

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories

Open access
Pisoni, David B., Tash, Jeffrey·1974·Perception & Psychophysics

Abstract

Same-different reaction times (RTs) were obtained to pairs of synthetic speech sounds ranging perceptually from /ba/ through /pa/. Listeners responded "same" if both stimuli in a pair were the same phonetic segments (i.e., /ba/-/ba/ or /pa/-/pa/) or "different" if both stimuli were different phonetic segments (i.e., /ba/-/pa/ or /pa/-/ba/). RT for "same" responses was faster to pairs of acoustically identical stimuli (A-A) than to pairs of acoustically different stimuli (A-a) belonging to the same phonetic category. RT for "different" responses was faster for large acoustic differences across a phonetic boundary than for smaller acoustic differences across a phonetic boundary. The results suggest that acoustic information for stop consonants is available to listeners, although the retrieval of this information in discrimination will depend on the level of processing accessed by the particular information processing task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03213946

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The P(Same) data reported by Pisoni and Tash differ markedly from our results, presumably because Pisoni and Tash gave their subjects explicit NI instructions.

    “The P(Same) data reported by Pisoni and Tash differ markedly from our results, presumably because Pisoni and Tash gave their subjects explicit NI instructions.”

    From Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception (1985) · cites this paper as Pisoni and Tash (1974)

  • The RT data obtained in Experiment 2 replicate Pisoni and Tash's (1974) findings.

    “The RT data we obtained in Experiment 2 replicate their findings.”

    From Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception (1985) · cites this paper as Pisoni and Tash (1974)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fujisaki. H., 8< Kawashima. T. Some experiments on speech perception and a model for the perceptual mechanism. Annual speech mode. In D. A. Hamburg (Ed.), Perception and its disorders. Proceedings of A.R.N.M.D. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1970. Pp. 238-254.
  2. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague, 1967. Prague: Academia, 1970. Pp. 563-567.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pisoni, D. B., & Tash, J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1974-03
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
285-290
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2084543000
Cited by
418
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000111-38)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
phonetic discrimination, reaction time, stop consonants, phonetic boundaries, synthetic speech, same-different judgments, levels of processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review