Cited by 56Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The status of alexithymia as a risk factor in medically unexplained physical symptoms

Kooiman, Cornelis G·1998·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

Some decennia ago, the concept of alexithymia was developed from the clinical experience of psychosomaticians who at the time were largely working within a psychoanalytic frame of reference. Alexithymia can briefly be described as a cognitive-affective disturbance characterized by difficulties in differentiating one's feelings and expressing them in words. Clinicians who treat patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms may often recognize alexithymic features in their patients. It is supposed that alexithymia could be a predisposing factor for the development or persistence of medically unexplained physical symptoms. In this review, the concept of alexithymia as well as paradigmatic shifts in psychoanalysis and psychosomatics are discussed to place the concept of alexithymia in its epistemiological context. Furthermore, the empirical literature on the association between alexithymia and medically unexplained physical symptoms is reviewed. The main conclusions are that alexithymia appears to be a theoretically important and clinically appealing concept, but that so far the empirical evidence that alexithymia predisposes to the development or persistence of medically unexplained physical symptoms is imperfect. This is mainly because of the cross-sectional design of most studies and is due to other methodological shortcomings, such as the lack of allowance for depression and anxiety as possible confounding factors. Suggestions for future research are made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-440x(98)90075-x

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kooiman, C. G.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Kooiman, Cornelis G
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
152-159
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059530065
Cited by
56
References
80
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
alexithymia, medically unexplained physical symptoms, somatic symptom disorder, risk factors, psychosomatic medicine, psychoanalysis, emotional awareness
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Psychoanalysis, Psychosomatic Medicine, Research Design, Risk Factors, Somatoform Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review