Cited by 50Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Expert opinions about the ICD-10 category of enduring personality change after catastrophic experience

Beltran, Ruth O, Silove, Derrick·1999·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

The inclusion of enduring personality change after catastrophic experience (EPCACE) as a diagnostic category in the ICD-10 represents a turning point in the evolution of the nosology of traumatic stress syndromes, yet many aspects of the diagnosis remain contentious. Given the absence of published research concerning this category, an exploratory survey of international experts was conducted using a questionnaire focusing on key aspects of the category, namely whether respondents used the diagnosis of EPCACE in their practice; which features were most salient in making a diagnosis of posttraumatic personality change; the types and characteristics of traumatic events that were judged to be most likely to cause EPCACE; and the possible limitations of the ICD-10 diagnosis. A response rate of 56.3% was obtained. A substantial portion of trauma experts working in the field of human-engendered violence recognize the possibility that certain traumas can result in personality change. However, questions were raised about the specificity of the criteria proposed for the category of EPCACE in ICD-10. A composite profile of proposed additional features suggests that a more comprehensive array of adaptational changes are recognized than are encompassed by EPCACE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-440x(99)90147-5

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beltran, R. O., & Silove, D.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Beltran, Ruth O
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
396-403
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037595860
Cited by
50
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
ICD-10, disease classification, diagnostic criteria, traumatic events, expert opinion
MeSH terms
Expert Testimony, Humans, New South Wales, Personality Assessment, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review