Exact charge conservation scheme for particle-in-cell simulation with an arbitrary form-factor
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The claims that global power coupling determines plasma properties and that plasma power absorption, density, and temperature profiles are very similar in various kinds of plasma discharges appear to be an oversimplification.
“However, the claims that in the end, it is the global power coupling that determines the plasma properties 144 and that the plasma power absorption, density, and temperature profiles are very similar in various kinds of plasma discharges 145 , appear to be an oversimplification 146 .”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The plasma simulation code: A modern particle-in-cell code with patch-based load-balancing
Germaschewski, K., Fox, W., Abbott, S., Ahmadi, N., Maynard, K., Wang, L., Ruhl, H., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2016) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.013 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms
Taccogna, F., Cichocki, F., Eremin, D., Fubiani, G., & Garrigues, L. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0153862 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Esirkepov, T. Z.
- Affiliations
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Esirkepov, T.Zh.
- ORCID
- Esirkepov, T.Zh.
- Venue
- Computer Physics Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-153
- ISSN
- 0010-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098906330
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Physics Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
- Keywords
- charge conservation, particle-in-cell simulation, current density, analytic geometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
