CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sudbury Breccia (Canada): a product of the 1850 Ma Sudbury Event and host to footwall Cu–Ni–PGE deposits

Rousell, Don H, Fedorowich, John S, Dressler, Burkhard O·2003·Earth-Science Reviews
DOI 10.1016/s0012-8252(02)00091-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0012-8252(02)00091-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Barlow, A.E., 1904. Report of the origin, geologic relations and composition of the nickel and copper deposits in the Sudbury Mining District, Ontario, Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Annual Report 873, 236 pp. · DOI
  2. Brockmeyer, P., 1990. Petrographische und geochemische untersuchungen an polymikten breccien der Onaping-Formation, Sudbury-District (Ontario, Kanada). PhD thesis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany, 228 pp.
  3. Card, 1968, Geology of the Denison-Waters Area, Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Report, 60
  4. Card, 1976, Geology of the Espanola–Whitefish Falls area, District of Sudbury, Ontario, Ontario Division of Mines, Geoscience Report, 131
  5. Card, 1978, Geology of the Sudbury–Manitoulin area, Districts of Sudbury and Manitoulin, Ontario Geological Survey Report, 166
  6. Card, 1976, Geology of the Dunlop–Shakespeare Area, District of Sudbury, Ontario Division of Mines, Geological Report, 139
  7. Chubb, 1994, Occurrences of pseudotachylite at the East Bull Lake and Shakespeare–Dunlop intrusions, Ontario, Canada, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 31, 1744, 10.1139/e94-155 · DOI
  8. Coleman, 1905, The Sudbury Nickel Region, Report of the Ontario Bureau of Mines, 14
  9. Cooke, 1946, Problems of Sudbury Geology Ontario, vol. 3
  10. Corfu, 1986, A U–Pb age for mineralized Nipissing diabase, Gowganda, Ontario, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23, 107, 10.1139/e86-011 · DOI
  11. Deutsch, 1995, The Sudbury Structure (Ontario, Canada): a tectonically deformed multi-ring impact basin, Geologische Rundschau, 84, 697, 10.1007/s005310050034 · DOI
  12. Dietz, 1962, Sudbury Structure as an astrobleme, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 43, 445
  13. Dietz, 1964, The Sudbury Structure as an astrobleme, Journal of Geology, 72, 412, 10.1086/626999 · DOI
  14. Dressler, 1979, Geology of McNish and Janes Townships, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey Report, 191
  15. Dressler, 1980, Geology of Emo, Rhodes and Botha Townships, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey Report, 196
  16. Dressler, 1982, Geology of Wanapitei Lake Area, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey Report, 213
  17. Dressler, 2001, Terrestrial impact melt rocks and glasses, Earth Science Reviews, 56, 205, 10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00064-2 · DOI
  18. Dressler, 1987, The Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada—a review, 39
  19. Dressler, 1992, Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, vol. 8
  20. Dupuis, 1982, Evidence for a genetic link between Sudbury Breccias and fenite breccias, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19, 1174, 10.1139/e82-100 · DOI
  21. Fairbairn, 1942, Breccia at Sudbury Ontario, Journal of Geology, 50, 1, 10.1086/625024 · DOI
  22. Folk, 1955, Student operator error in determination of roundness, sphericity, and grain size, Journal of Sedimentary Petrography, 25, 297
  23. Frarey, 1985, Proterozoic geology of the Lake Panache–Collins Inlet area, Ontario, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper, 83-22
  24. French, 1967, Sudbury structure, Ontario: some petrographic evidence for origin by meteorite impact, Science, 156, 1094, 10.1126/science.156.3778.1094 · DOI
  25. French, 1972, Shock-metmorphic features in the Sudbury structure, Ontario: a review, 10, 19
  26. French, 1998, Traces of Catastrophe. A handbook of shock-metamorphic effects in terrestrial meteorite impact structures, vol. 954
  27. Gates, 1991, Sudbury mineral occurrence study, Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report, 5771
  28. Gibbins, S.F.M., 1994. Geology, geochemistry, stratigraphy and mechanisms of emplacement of the Onaping Formation, Dowling area, Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada. MSc thesis, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, 314 pp.
  29. Ginn, 1965, Nairn and Lorne Townships, Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Report, 35
  30. Gray, M.J., 1995. The geological setting of the Vermilion Zn–Cu–Pb–Ag–Au massive sulphide deposit, Sudbury Basin, Ontario, Canada. MSc thesis, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, 244 pp.
  31. Grieve, 1991, The Sudbury structure: controversial or misunderstood?, Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 22753, 10.1029/91JE02513 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Guy-Bray, 1966, Shatter cones at Sudbury, Journal of Geology, 74, 243, 10.1086/627158 · DOI
  33. Hanley, J.J., 2002. The distribution of the halogens in Sudbury Breccia matrix as pathfinder elements for footwall Cu–PGE mineralization at the Fraser Cu zone, Barnet main copper zone, and surrounding margin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Onaping–Levack area, Ontario, Canada. MSc thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 248 pp.
  34. Heaman, 1989, U–Pb dating of mafic dyke swarms. International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior. Continental Magmatism (Abstracts), New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Bulletin, 131, 125
  35. Killick, 1990, Review of the pseudotachylites in and around the Vredefort “Dome”, South Africa, South Africa Journal of Geology, 93, 350
  36. Lakomy, 1990, Implications for cratering mechanics from a study of the Footwall Breccia of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada, Meteoritics, 25, 195, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00997.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Langford, 1960, Geology of Levack township and the northern part of Dowling township, district of Sudbury, Ontario Department of Mines, Preliminary Report, 1960-5
  38. Lawton, 1955, Geology of Delhi Township, Ontario Bureau of Mines, 63
  39. Lowman, 1997, Original size and shape of the Sudbury structure, vol. 922, 31
  40. Lowman, 1999, Original size of the Sudbury structure: evidence from field investigations and imaging radar, vol. 24, 74
  41. Maddock, 1983, Melt origin of fault-generated pseudotachylytes demonstrated by textures, Geology, 11, 105, 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<105:MOOFPD>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  42. Mitchell, 1956, Geology of the Hardy mine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Transactions, 49, 37
  43. Müller-Mohr, 1992, Breccias in the basement of a deeply-eroded impact structure, Sudbury, Canada, Tectonophysics, 216, 219, 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90168-6 · DOI
  44. Müller-Mohr, V., 1992. Gangbreccien der Sudbury Struktur; Geologie, Petrographie und Geochemie der Sudbury–Breccie, Ontario, Kanada. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Münster, Germany, 139 pp. and appendices.
  45. Paakki, J.J., 1992. The Errington Zn–Cu–Pb massive sulphide deposit, Sudbury, Ontario: its structural and stratigraphic setting and footwall alteration. MSc thesis, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, 140 pp.
  46. Pattison, 1979, The Sublayer: its characteristics and relationship to the Main Mass of the Sudbury irruptive, Canadian Mineralogist, 17, 257
  47. Reimold, 1995, Pseudotachylite in impact structures-generation by friction melting and shock brecciation?: a review and discussion, Earth-Science Reviews, 39, 247, 10.1016/0012-8252(95)00033-X · DOI
  48. Reynolds, 1954, Fluidization as a geological process, and its bearing on the problem of intrusive granites, American Journal of Science, 252, 577, 10.2475/ajs.252.10.577 · DOI
  49. Riller, 1997, Mid-crustal deformation of the southern flank of the Sudbury Basin, central Ontario, Canada, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109, 841, 10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0841:MCDATS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  50. Roscoe, 1992, Early proterozoic tectonics and metallogeny of the Lake Huron region of the Canadian shield, Precambrian Research, 58, 99, 10.1016/0301-9268(92)90115-5 · DOI
  51. Rousell, 1981, Sudbury and the meteorite theory, Geoscience Canada, 8, 167
  52. Rousell, 1994, The origin of clastic Sudbury Breccia, vol. 19, A95
  53. Rousell, 1998, Are outliers of the Huronian Supergroup preserved in structures associated with the collapse of the Sudbury impact crater?, Journal of Geology, 106, 407, 10.1086/516032 · DOI
  54. Rousell, 1996, Nature and origin of Sudbury Breccia, vol. 21, A81
  55. Rousell, 1997, The tectonic, magmatic and mineralization history of the Sudbury Structure, Exploration and Mining Geology, 6, 1
  56. Schandl, 1994, Albitization at 1700±−2 Ma in the Sudbury–Wanapitei Lake area, Ontario: implications for deep-seated alkalic magmatism in the Southern Province, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 31, 597, 10.1139/e94-052 · DOI
  57. Scott, 1999, The South Range Breccia Belt (SRBB) of the Sudbury impact structure: a deformed crater rim collapse feature, vol. 24, 111
  58. Scott, 2000, The South Range Breccia Belt of the Sudbury Structure: a possible terrace collapse structure, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 35, 505, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01432.x · DOI
  59. Shand, 1916, The pseudotachylyte of Parijs (Orange Free State) and its relation to “trap-shotten gneiss” and “flinty crush-rock”, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 72, 198, 10.1144/GSL.JGS.1916.072.01-04.12 · DOI
  60. Shanks, 1991, Structural analysis of the central and southwestern Sudbury Structure, Southern Province, Canadian shield, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 28, 411, 10.1139/e91-037 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Shaw, 1999, Sudbury-type breccias in the Huronian Gowganda Formation near Whitefish Falls, Ontario: products of diabase intrusion into incompletely consolidated sediments?, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 36, 1435, 10.1139/e99-057 · DOI
  62. Shimamoto, 1992, An argument against the crush origin of pseudotachylytes based on clast-size distribution, Journal of Structural Geology, 14, 999, 10.1016/0191-8141(92)90031-Q · DOI
  63. Sibson, 1975, Generation of pseudotachylyte by ancient seismic faulting, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 43, 775, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb06195.x · DOI
  64. Simony, 1964, Northwestern Timagami area, Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Report, 28
  65. Souch, 1969, The sulfide ores of Sudbury: their particular relationship to a distinct inclusion-bearing facies of the Nickel Irruptive, Economic Geology Monograph, 4, 252
  66. Speers, 1957, The age relation and origin of common Sudbury Breccia, Journal of Geology, 65, 497, 10.1086/626451 · DOI
  67. Spray, 1992, A physical basis for the melting of some rock-forming minerals, Tectonophysics, 204, 205, 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90308-S · DOI
  68. Spray, 1994, Displacement associated with shock veins in four stony meteorites: evidence for frictional contribution to melting, vol. 19, A106
  69. Spray, 1995, Pseudotachylyte controversy: fact or friction?, Geology, 23, 1119, 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1119:PCFOF>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Spray, 1997, Superfaults, Geology, 25, 579, 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0579:S>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  71. Spray, 1999, Constraints on the size and morphometry of the Sudbury impact structure, vol. 24, 119
  72. Spray, 1995, Friction melt distribution in a multi-impact basin, Nature (London), 73, 130, 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Stockelmann, 1989, The HMX mixing calculation program, Mathamatical Geology, 21, 853, 10.1007/BF00894452 · DOI
  74. Stockwell, 1982, Proposals for time classification and correlation of Precambrian rocks and events in Canada and adjacent areas of the Canadian Shield, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper, 80-19
  75. Stoness, J.A., 1994. The statigraphy, geochemistry and depositional environment of the Paleoproterozoic Vermilion and Onwatin Formations and their relationship to the Zn–Cu–Pb massive sulphide deposits in the Sudbury Basin. MSc thesis, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, 205 pp.
  76. Thompson, L.M., 1996. A study of pseudotachylyte associated with Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada. PhD thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, 202 pp.
  77. Thompson, 1996, Pseudotachylyte petrogenesis: constraints from the Sudbury impact structure, Contributions to Mineralology and Petrology, 125, 359, 10.1007/s004100050228 · DOI
  78. Thomson, 1952, Geology of Baldwin Township, Ontario Department of Mines, 61
  79. Turcotte, 1986, Fractals and fragmentation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 91, 1921, 10.1029/JB091iB02p01921 · DOI
  80. Wenk, 1978, Are pseudotachylite products of fracture or fusion?, Geology, 6, 507, 10.1130/0091-7613(1978)6<507:APPOFO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  81. Williams, 1957, Glowing avalanche deposits of the Sudbury Basin, Ontario Department of Mines, Annual Report for 1956, 65, 57
  82. Yates, 1938, The Sudbury Intrusive, Royal Society of Canada, Proceedings and Transactions, Third Series, 32, 151

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 51

Metadata

Authors
Rousell, D. H., Fedorowich, J. S., & Dressler, B. O.
Venue
Earth-Science Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
60
Issue
3-4
Pages
147-174
ISSN
0012-8252
DOI
10.1016/s0012-8252(02)00091-0
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review