Cited by 15Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTreatment of Major DepressionAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

Effects of ketamine on synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in layer II/III of rat visual cortex in vitro

Salami, Mahmoud, Fathollahi, Yaghoub, Esteky, Hossein, Motamedi, Fereshteh, Atapour, Nafiseh·2000·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The effects of ketamine, which has NMDA receptor antagonist properties, on synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in layer II/III of adult rat visual cortex were examined in vitro. Field potentials were recorded in layer II/III following layer IV stimulation. Primed-burst stimulation was used for induction of long-term potentiation. Stimulation of layer IV resulted in a two-component response in layer II/III, a population excitatory postsynaptic potential1 (EPSP1) and a population excitatory postsynaptic potential2 (EPSP2). DL-2-Amino-5-phosphono-valeric acid (AP5), a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, reduced the amplitude of the population EPSP1 while ketamine increased the amplitude of the population EPSP2. The results showed that primed-burst stimulation induced long-term potentiation in layer II/III of the visual cortex in vitro. Preincubation for 30 min with AP5 (25-100 microM) reduced the extent of long-term potentiation of the population EPSP2 and blocked the induction of long-term potentiation of the population EPSP1. When ketamine (100-200 microM) was present for 30 min prior to tetanic stimulation, it blocked the induction of long-term potentiation of the population EPSP1 and reduced the extent of long-term potentiation of the population EPSP2. We conclude that ketamine can interfere with synaptic transmission in the visual cortex. Primed-burst stimulation is an effective protocol for neocortical potentiation. NMDA receptors are involved in the induction of long-term potentiation by primed-burst stimulation of the population EPSP1 and population EPSP2 in adult rat visual cortex in vitro.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00034-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salami, M., Fathollahi, Y., Esteky, H., Motamedi, F., & Atapour, N.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
  • Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Salami, Mahmoud
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
390
Issue
3
Pages
287-293
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081753740
Cited by
15
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
ketamine, NMDA receptor antagonism, long-term potentiation, synaptic transmission, visual cortex, layer 2/3, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, AP5, tetanic stimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Electric Stimulation, Female, Ketamine, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Visual Cortex, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review