Cited by 289Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and DisordersReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous use of an oral contraceptive for endometriosis-associated recurrent dysmenorrhea that does not respond to a cyclic pill regimen

Open access

Abstract

Objective To ascertain whether long-term reduction of pain is obtained by continuous administration of an oral contraceptive (OC) in women with endometriosis-associated recurrent dysmenorrhea that does not respond to cyclic OC use.Design Prospective, therapeutic, self-controlled clinical trial.Setting A tertiary care and referral center for patients with endometriosis.Patient(s) Fifty women who underwent surgery for endometriosis in the previous year and experienced recurrent dysmenorrhea despite cyclic OC use.Intervention(s) Continuous use of an OC containing ethinyl estradiol (0.02 mg) and desogestrel (0.15 mg) for 2 years.Main outcome measure(s) Dysmenorrhea variation during cyclic and continuous OC use, evaluated with a 100-mm visual analog scale and a 0- to 3-point verbal rating scale, and degree of satisfaction with continuous OC treatment.Result(s) In the study period, amenorrhea, spotting, and breakthrough bleeding were reported by 19 (38%), 18 (36%), and 13 (26%) women. The mean +/- SD number of >7-day bleeding episodes with consequent 7-day OC suspension was 5.5 +/- 2.1. The mean +/- SD dysmenorrhea visual analog scale and verbal rating scale scores were 75 +/- 13 and 2.4 +/- 0.5 at baseline and 31 +/- 17 and 0.7 +/- 0.6 at 2-year follow-up, respectively. Moderate or severe side effects were reported by 7/50 (14%) women. At final evaluation, 13 (26%) women were very satisfied, 27 (54%) were satisfied, 1 (2%) was uncertain, 8 (16%) were dissatisfied, and 1 (2%) was very dissatisfied.Conclusion(s) Long-term continuous OC use can be proposed to women with symptomatic endometriosis and menstruation-related pain symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00794-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Vercellini, P., Frontino, G., De Giorgi, O., Pietropaolo, G., Pasin, R., & Crosignani, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Vercellini, Paolo
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
560-563
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068661759
Cited by
289
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, desogestrel, ethinyl estradiol, amenorrhea, breakthrough bleeding, treatment satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis, Ethinyl Estradiol, Female, Humans, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Desogestrel, Retreatment, Estradiol Congeners, Progesterone Congeners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review