Cited by 182Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population

Open access
Grow, Daniel R., Oehninger, Sergio, Seltman, Howard J., Toner, James P., Swanson, R. James, Kruger, Thinus F., Muasher, Suheil J.·1994·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To investigate the predictive value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria on IVF outcome. Design Retrospective analysis of all IVF cycles (January 1987 to December 1992). Main outcome measures All patients were assigned to one of three groups based on sperm morphology: P-pattern ( 14% normal forms). Morphology pattern was related to other semen characteristics and IVF outcome. Results Despite corrective measures at oocyte insemination, the fertilization rate was significantly different among the three morphology groups, P Conclusions Strict morphology is an excellent biomarker of sperm fertilizing capacity, independent of motility and concentration. P-pattern sperm may denote a poorer prognosis for establishing a pregnancy, even after a satisfactory fertilization rate is achieved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56946-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grow, D. R., Oehninger, S., Seltman, H. J., Toner, J. P., Swanson, R. J., Kruger, T. F., & Muasher, S. J.
Affiliations
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-09
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
559-567
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1714560337
Cited by
182
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm morphology, teratozoospermia, IVF outcomes, fertilization rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, sperm fertilizing capacity, sperm motility, sperm concentration, semen quality biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fertilization, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review