Cited by 13Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

ICSI improves fertilization in isolated teratozoospermic men: a study with strictly controlled external factors and WHO-5 standard

Open access
Zhu, Yuan, Wu, Qiong-fang, Zhou, Xiao-Jun, Xin, Cai-lin, Ling, Ge, Lu, Guang-xiu·2013·Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine

Abstract

A clear clinical management pathway (conventional in vitro fertilization, IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI) for treating patients with teratozoospermia is lacking. Here we conducted a retrospective study of fertility indices in 2,178 IVF/ICSI cycles in order to reevaluate clinical management of couples with isolated teratozoospermia (< 4% morphologically normal sperms and normal sperm concentration and motility with the standard of WHO-5).We strictly controlled external factors that could affect oocyte quality or endometrial receptivity to minimize the impact of confounders. Fertilization, total fertilization failure, embryo quality, blastocyst formation rate, and pregnancy rate were studied. Retrospectively, in conventional IVF cycles a significantly lower fertilization rate and higher total fertilization failure rate were observed in couples with isolated teratozoospermia as compared to couples with a normal semen profile. Furthermore, when ICSI was used to treat these teratozoospermic couples, improvement in fertilization was noted. However, the embryo quality, blastocyst formation rate, and pregnancy of couples with isolated teratozoospermia were not enhanced by ICSI. Multiple variable analysis showed that many factors including percentage of morphologically normal sperm are statistically correlated with fertilization rate and total fertilization failure in conventional IVF cycles. In addition the insemination method was correlated with fertilization rate in cases with isolated teratozoospermia. Further studies are warranted to compare outcomes of conventional IVF and ICSI in cases of isolated teratozoospermia, where less than 5 oocytes are retrieved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/19396368.2012.727061

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Menkveld, R. (1987) An investigation of environmental influences on spermatogenesis and semen parameters. (PhD dissertation (in Afrikaans). South Africa: Faculty of Medicine, University of Stellenbosch.
  2. WHO (1980) World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 1 st ed, Singapore Press, Singapore.
  3. WHO (1987) World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human semen and Semen-cervical Mucus Interaction, 2 nd ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  4. WHO (1992) World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 3 rd ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  5. WHO (2010) World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5 th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Y., Wu, Q.-F., Zhou, X.-J., Xin, C.-L., Ling, G., & Lu, G.-X.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN)
Venue
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine
Published
2012-10-08
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
21-26
ISSN
  • 1939-6368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-6376
OpenAlex
W2058090314
Cited by
13
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
intracytoplasmic sperm injection, conventional in vitro fertilization, fertilization rate, fertilization failure, embryo quality, blastocyst rate, pregnancy rate, sperm morphology, oocyte quality, endometrial receptivity, male infertility
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fertilization, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Pregnancy Rate, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review