Cited by 66Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success

Open access
Karabinus, David S., Gelety, Timothy J.·1997·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To determine the relationship between IUI success and the level of morphologically normal sperm, evaluated using strict criteria, in the raw semen. Design Evaluation of semen quality characteristics and pregnancy results for 538 stimulated IUI cycles. Setting University medical center infertility clinic. Patient(s) Women undergoing IUI with their partner's semen as treatment for infertility (n = 193). Intervention(s) Ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate, hMG, or both; preparation of raw semen using wash and swim-up or Percoll; deposition of prepared semen at the uterine fundus. Main outcome measure(s) Pregnancy status after IUI. Percentage morphologically normal sperm in raw semen, evaluated using strict criteria. Sperm concentration and percentage motile sperm in raw and prepared semen. Result(s) Pregnancy rates (PRs) per cycle were not different when the percentage of morphologically normal sperm in raw semen was or = 30% (6.5% +/- 3.9%, 13.6% +/- 3.2%, 8.8% +/- 2.4%, 7.1% +/- 2.5%, and 9.7% +/- 3.3%, respectively). Pregnancy rates did not differ among age groups, infertility diagnoses, ovarian stimulation protocols, or semen preparation methods. Conclusion(s) The percentage of morphologically normal sperm in the raw semen, as judged by strict criteria, did not affect IUI PR. Intrauterine insemination appears to be a successful treatment modality for male factor infertility, even when the percentage of morphologically normal sperm in raw semen is very low.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80082-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have called into question the predictive value of sperm morphology for pregnancy and the need to move directly to ICSI in those with teratozoospermia.

    “Recent studies have called into question the predictive value of sperm morphology for pregnancy and the need to move directly to ICSI in those with teratozoospermia (Matorras et al., 1995;Karabinus & Gelety, 1997;Check et al., 2007;Deveneau et al., 2014).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karabinus, D. S., & Gelety, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
536-541
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072107616
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm morphology, intrauterine insemination, male factor infertility, pregnancy rate, semen preparation, swim-up, Percoll density gradient, ovulation induction, clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonadotropin, sperm motility, sperm concentration
MeSH terms
Adult, Clomiphene, Female, Humans, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Menotropins, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Semen, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Uterus, Least-Squares Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review