Cited by 43Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination

Open access
Spiessens, Carl, Vanderschueren, Dirk, Meuleman, Christel, D'Hooghe, Thomas·2003·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective This study tests the hypothesis that IUI treatment in cases with isolated teratozoospermia ( Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting An academic fertility center. Patient(s) Eight hundred seventy-two IUI cycles in 440 couples were analyzed. Intervention(s) Couples (n = 440) were classified in three groups: normozoospermia (n = 213), isolated teratozoospermia (n = 104), and male factor infertility (n = 123). Main outcome measure(s) Live birth rate per cycle and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Result(s) The three groups were similar with regard to female age, female infertility factors, and ovarian response after hormonal stimulation. The overall CLBR after four cycles was 41.5%, and was significantly increased in the normozoospermic group (52.8%) when compared to the isolated teratozoospermia group (33.4%) and the male factor infertility group (31.4%). Conclusion(s) This study documents for the first time that the CLBR after four IUI cycles is significantly and similarly reduced in couples with isolated teratozoospermia as in couples with other sperm defects, when compared to couples with normozoospermia. As with couples with male factor infertility, couples with isolated teratozoospermia should be counseled about other treatment options such as IVF, as the CLBR after three IVF cycles is 70%-80% in our program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01172-5

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiessens, C., Vanderschueren, D., Meuleman, C., & D'Hooghe, T.
Affiliations
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Spiessens, Carl
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
1185-1189
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048874912
Cited by
43
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
intrauterine insemination, male factor infertility, cumulative live birth rate, sperm morphology, normozoospermia, infertility counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Rate, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Spermatozoa, Cohort Studies, Life Tables, Case-Control Studies, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review