Effect of Sperm Morphology on Pregnancy Success via Intrauterine Insemination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
PURPOSE: Men with abnormal sperm morphology are often counseled that natural conception and intrauterine insemination are ineffective, and in vitro fertilization is the only option. Our objective was to determine the effect of sperm morphology on the pregnancy success of intrauterine insemination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched for studies published prior to January 2017 that 1) reported ultrasound verified clinical pregnancies per intrauterine insemination cycle, 2) assessed sperm morphology using the Kruger strict criteria and 3) described morphology at the greater than 4% and 4% or less and/or the 1% or greater and less than 1% thresholds. In all studies mean female age was between 25 and 40 years and mean total motile sperm count was greater than 10 million. Estimates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 20 observational studies involving a total of 41,018 cycles. When comparing men at the greater than 4% and 4% or less thresholds, the rate of ultrasound verified pregnancy per intrauterine insemination cycle was not statistically or clinically different (14.2% vs 12.1%, p = 0.06) and the risk difference was 3.0% (95% CI 1.4-4.6), indicating 3.0 additional pregnancies per 100 intrauterine insemination cycles. When comparing men at the 1% or greater and the less than 1% thresholds, there were no statistical or clinical differences in the rate of ultrasound verified pregnancy per cycle of intrauterine insemination (14.0% vs 13.9%, p = 0.97) or in the risk difference (1.6%, 95% CI -4.5-7.6). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no clinical difference in intrauterine insemination pregnancy success among men with normal and abnormal sperm morphology when accounting for total motile sperm count and female age. Abnormal sperm morphology alone should not exclude couples from attempting intrauterine insemination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization
Kruger, T. F., Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Lombard, C. J., Van der Merwe, J. P., van Zyl, J. A., & Smith, K. (1986) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49891-2 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis
Jackson, D., & Turner, R. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1240 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion
(2015) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Sterne, J. A. C., Jüni, P., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Bartlett, C., & Egger, M. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1184 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study
Katz, P., Showstack, J. A., Smith, J. F., Nachtigall, R. D., Millstein, S. G., Wing, H. E., Eisenberg, M. L., Pasch, L. A., Croughan, M. S., & Adler, N. E. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.026 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Waart, J. V. (2001) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/7.5.495 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Menkveld, R. (2010) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1038/aja.2009.14 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Ombelet, W. U. A. M., Vandeput, H., de Putte, G. V., Cox, A., Janssen, M. A. C., Jacobs, P., Bosmans, E., Steeno, O., & Kruger, T. F. (1997) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/12.7.1458 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Hotaling, J. M., Smith, J. F., Rosen, M., Muller, C. H., & Walsh, T. J. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.029 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Lemmens, L., Kos, S., Beijer, C., Brinkman, J. W., van der Horst, F. A. L., van den Hoven, L., Kieslinger, D. C., van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff, N. J., Wolthuis, A., Hendriks, J. C. M., et al. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.012 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Toner, J. P., Mossad, H., Grow, D. R., Morshedi, M., Swanson, R. J., & Oehninger, S. (2009) · Andrologia · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.1995.tb01085.x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The association between Peyronie's and Dupuytren's disease
Nugteren, H. M., Nijman, J., de Jong, I., & van Driel, M. V. (2011) · International journal of impotence research · doi:10.1038/ijir.2011.18 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Matorras, R., Corcóstegui, B., Perez, C., Mandiola, M., Mendoza, R., & Rodríguez-Escudero, F. J. (1995) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57434-2 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success
Karabinus, D. S., & Gelety, T. J. (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80082-9 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Smith, R., Kovac, J., Cajipe, M., Lamb, D., & Lipshultz, L. (2017) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/1008-682x.189211 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Fifteen years of Belgian experience with external quality assessment of semen analysis
Punjabi, U., Wyns, C., Mahmoud, A., Vernelen, K., China, B., & Verheyen, G. (2016) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12230 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Yang, J., Jia, Y., Xiong, C., Meng, T., Guan, H., Xia, W., Ding, M., & Yuchi, M. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.047 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination
Deveneau, N. E., Sinno, O., Krause, M., Eastwood, D., Sandlow, J. I., Robb, P., Granlund, A., & Strawn, E. Y. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.016 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Lindheim, S. R., Barad, D. H., Zinger, M., Witt, B. R., Amin, H. K., Cohen, B. L., Fisch, H., & Barg, P. E. (1996) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02066610 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination
Lockwood, G. M., Deveneau, N. E., Shridharani, A. N., Strawn, E. Y., & Sandlow, J. I. (2015) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12098 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
REEVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATING SPERM MORPHOLOGY USING STRICT CRITERIA
Check, M. L., Bollendorf, A., CHECK, J. H., & Katsoff, D. (2002) · Archives of Andrology · doi:10.1080/014850102753385134 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Luco, S. M., Agbo, C., Behr, B. R., & Dahan, M. H. (2014) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.003 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sun, Y., Li, B., Fan, L. Q., Zhu, W. B., Chen, X. J., Feng, J. H., Yang, C. L., & Zhang, Y. H. (2012) · Andrologia · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2012.01280.x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Erdem, M., Erdem, A., Mutlu, M. F., Ozisik, S., Yildiz, S., Guler, I., & Karakaya, C. (2016) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.014 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications
Morbeck, D. E., Leonard, P. H., Weaver, A. L., Shimek, K. M., Bouwsma, E. V. A., & Coddington, C. C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.036 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Gatimel, N., Mansoux, L., Moreau, J., Parinaud, J., & Léandri, R. D. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.038 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Trends in sperm morphology after implementation of a quality improvement initiative
Hokenstad, A., Leonard, P. H., Weaver, A. L., Coddington, C. C., & Morbeck, D. E. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.902 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Patounakis, G., Richter, K. S., DeCherney, A. H., & Devine, K. (2015) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.756 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Assessing who 2010 semen analysis parameters for predicting pregnancy in an infertile population
Mays, M. K., New, E. P., Chelmow, D. P., & Lucidi, R. S. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1174 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Anderson, K. S., Miller, B. T., Wolf, L., & Shah, T. A. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.535 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sperm DNA fragmentation as treatment guidance for infertile couples
Paniza, T., Cozzubbo, T., Parrella, A., Cheung, S., Goldstein, M., Rosenwaks, Z., & Palermo, G. D. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.230 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sperm Morphology: History, Challenges, and Impact on Natural and Assisted Fertility
Danis, R. B., & Samplaski, M. K. (2019) · Current Urology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11934-019-0911-7 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Shah, R., Agarwal, A., Kavoussi, P., Rambhatla, A., Saleh, R., Cannarella, R., Harraz, A. M., Boitrelle, F., Kuroda, S., Hamoda, T. A.-A. A.-M., et al. (2023) · The World Journal of Men's Health · doi:10.5534/wjmh.220048 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“While earlier studies often attributed significant predictive value to morphology [26], recently there has been criticism that the criteria have become too strict resulting in an excessive diagnosis of teratozoospermia and loss of clinical predictive value [27,28].”
BackgroundCutting-Edge Evaluation of Male Infertility
Pathak, U. I., Gabrielsen, J. S., & Lipshultz, L. I. (2020) · Urologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2019.12.001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Drevet, J. R., Hallak, J., Nasr-Esfahani, M.-H., & Aitken, R. J. (2021) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2021.0235 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“These recommendations refer to sperm count and morphology, two parameters for which there is nowadays a consensus that they are poorly correlated with reproductive success (37, 94, 103).”
Agarwal, A., Sharma, R., Gupta, S., Finelli, R., Parekh, N., Panner Selvam, M. K., Henkel, R., Durairajanayagam, D., Pompeu, C., Madani, S., et al. (2022) · The World Journal of Men's Health · doi:10.5534/wjmh.210054 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“org reason why several recent studies [25] report that IUI pregnancy rates were unaffected by teratozoospermia.”
BackgroundResultSperm morphology: Evaluating its clinical relevance in contemporary fertility practice
Pelzman, D. L., & Sandlow, J. I. (2024) · Reproductive Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1002/rmb2.12594 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“57 No significant difference in ultrasound-verified pregnancy rates was found when using either 4% or 1% normal forms threshold.”
MethodHansen, K. R., Peck, J. D., Coward, R. M., Wild, R. A., Trussell, J. C., Krawetz, S. A., Diamond, M. P., Legro, R. S., Coutifaris, C., Alvero, R. J., et al. (2020) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa027 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“analysis has suggested no relationship between pregnancy outcomes and low versus normal morphology, even when the threshold for normal morphology was reduced to 1% (Kohn et al., 2018).”
BackgroundEvaluation of the impact of marijuana use on semen quality: a prospective analysis
Hehemann, M. C., Raheem, O. A., Rajanahally, S., Holt, S., Chen, T., Fustok, J. N., Song, K., Rylander, H., Chow, E., Ostrowski, K. A., et al. (2021) · Therapeutic Advances in Urology · doi:10.1177/17562872211032484 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Chen, T., Zhang, L., Yao, L., Luan, J., Zhou, X., Cong, R., Guo, X., Qin, C., & Song, N. (2023) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108292 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Mazaheri Moghaddam, M., Mazaheri Moghaddam, M., Hamzeiy, H., Baghbanzadeh, A., Pashazadeh, F., & Sakhinia, E. (2021) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-020-02008-w · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Role of Sperm Morphology in Deciding Between Various Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Kohn, T. P., Kohn, J. R., & Lamb, D. J. (2018) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.029 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationKnowledge gaps in male infertility: a reproductive endocrinology and infertility perspective
Morin, S. J., & Scott, R. T. (2018) · Translational Andrology and Urology · doi:10.21037/tau.2018.05.02 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Despite a significant focus in andrology labs in demonstrating technician proficiency in morphologic testing, this data point is not predictive of pregnancy rates following IUI (18) or IVF (10).”
BackgroundInfluentialChen, L., Li, D., Ni, X., Zhu, L., Zhang, N., Fang, J., Jiang, W., & Wang, J. (2020) · Andrologia · doi:10.1111/and.13568 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Luo, Y., Wu, S., Yuan, J., Zhou, H., Zhong, Y., Zhang, M., Li, Q., Xu, X., Sun, X., & Zhu, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.638560 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Pham, T. D., Dang, V. Q., Ho, V. N. A., Tran, C. T., Nguyen, D. T. P., Vuong, L. N., Ho, T. M., Mol, B. W., & Wang, R. (2025) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae252 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“These findings, along with the evidence from our study, suggest a limited role of sperm morphology in predicting outcomes or treatment effects in both IUI and IVF settings (Kohn et al. , 2018).”
Normal sperm head morphometric reference values in fertile Asian males
Jia, Y.-L., Wu, Y.-B., Lin, Y., Zheng, Y., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Zhou, B., Zhang, L., & Li, F. (2023) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/aja202356 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ainsworth, A. J., Barnard, E., Baumgarten, S. C., Weaver, A. L., & Khan, Z. (2020) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-020-01918-z · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wald, G., Punjani, N., Hayden, R., Feliciano, M., Dudley, V. L., & Goldstein, M. (2021) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.003 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Stanhiser, J., Mersereau, J. E., Dock, D., Boylan, C. F., Caprell, H., Coward, R. M., Berger, D. S., & Fritz, M. A. (2020) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.007 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“forms) and severe teratospermia (<1% normal forms), on IUI outcome have concluded that there is no difference in pregnancy success among men with and without teratospermia when accounting for total motile sperm (TMS) count (11, 12).”
BackgroundResultLeung, E. T. Y., Mei, X., Lee, B. K. M., Lam, K. K. W., Lee, C., Li, R., Ng, E. H. Y., Yeung, W. S. B., Yu, L., & Chiu, P. C. N. (2025) · Human Reproduction Open · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoaf024 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“A meta-analysis involving 41,018 intrauterine insemination cycles concluded that the clinical pregnancy rates were similar between men with sperm morphology > 4% and < 4% (Kohn et al. , 2018b).”
InfluentialIlktac, A., Hamidli, S., Ersoz, C., Dogan, B., & Akcay, M. (2020) · Andrologia · doi:10.1111/and.13875 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“There are physicians who believe that natural conception or even pregnancy with IUI is not possible for men with normal morphology less than 4 and recommend IVF in such cases (Kohn et al., 2018).”
BackgroundBerntsen, S., Nøhr, B., Grøndahl, M. L., Petersen, M. R., Andersen, L. F., Englund, A. L. M., Knudsen, U. B., Prætorius, L., Zedeler, A., Nielsen, H. S., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Xiao, H., Yao, R.-J., He, H., Ding, Y.-L., Yang, P., Chen, Q., Huang, H.-L., Chen, X., Wang, M., Tang, S.-X., et al. (2025) · World Journal of Urology · doi:10.1007/s00345-025-05702-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kozar, N., Kovač, V., & Reljič, M. (2021) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-021-02224-y · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“concluded that sperm morphology had no effect on IUI success rates [24].”
BackgroundFarber, N. J., Madhusoodanan, V., Gerkowicz, S. A., Patel, P., & Ramasamy, R. (2019) · Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine · doi:10.21037/gpm.2019.09.04 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“performed a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the effect of sperm morphology on pregnancy success via IUI (10).”
Self-citationJiang, W., Zhu, L., Gao, L., Wang, J., Fang, J., Chen, L., & Wang, S. (2024) · Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine · doi:10.1080/19396368.2024.2375710 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Some believed that sperm morphology only has a negative effect on intrauterine insemination or the fertilization rate of IVF cycles, but not on the fertilization rate of ICSI cycles (French et al. 2010; van den Hoven et al. 2015; Kohn et al. 2018).”
Luo, Y., Liu, M., Wu, S., Zhang, M., Yuan, J., Zhong, Y., Li, Q., Sun, X., Xu, X., & Zhu, D. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-05029-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“also supported this conclusion and suggested that the current sperm morphology assessment is so strict that its predictive value for IUI has been lost [37].”
ResultAutomated Deep Learning Model for Sperm Head Segmentation, Pose Correction, and Classification
Guo, Y., Li, J., Hong, K., Wang, B., Zhu, W., Li, Y., Lv, T., & Wang, L. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142311303 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Wyns, C., Vogiatzi, P., Saleh, R., Shah, R., & Agarwal, A. (2024) · Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health · doi:10.1177/26334941241303888 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cheng, L. G., Miller, D., Pelzman, D. L., Wecht, A., & Hwang, K. (2024) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2024.01.002 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“However, past survey studies have demonstrated the pervasive belief among physicians of the value of sperm morphology, potentially leading to counseling patients toward more expensive ART therapies (16).”
BackgroundDelaroche, L., Caillou, H., Lamazou, F., Genauzeau, E., Meicler, P., Oger, P., Dupont, C., & Humaidan, P. (2020) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.017 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Effect of staining methods on human sperm morphometrics using HT CASA II
Chaiya, J., Vinayanuvattikhun, N., Tanprasertkul, C., Chaidarun, T., Mebuathong, T., & Kaset, C. (2022) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102322 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Current and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose and Treat Male Infertility
Marinaro, J. A., & Goldstein, M. (2025) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82990-1_1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Weng, Y., Zou, Y., Jin, Y., Wei, S., Zhang, F., Li, R., Mei, L., Yang, D., Deng, Z., Qu, R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.202400560 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“A misjudgment of 1–2 sperm morphology can result in a 1% precision error, and the selection of observation areas based on the doctor's experience can also lead to representative and accuracy errors in the results [11, 12].”
An Algorithm to Predict the Lack of Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination in Infertile Patients
Grau, E. G., Oliveira, M. A., Amengual, M. J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, E., Veraguas-Imbernon, A., Costa, L., Benet, J., & Ribas‐Maynou, J. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12093225 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yavuzcan, A., Yurtçu, E., Keyif, B., & Osmanlıoğlu, Ş. (2023) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14010043 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Post-wash semen parameters may not always correlate with pre-wash semen parameters [12].”
BackgroundInfluentialZheng, Y., Wu, Y.-B., Yu, L., Liu, Y., Yuan, J.-T., Diao, C.-C., Ma, Y., Jia, Y. A. N. G., & Li, F.-P. (2026) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/aja202582 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wan, B., Ma, N., Zhou, Z., Lu, W., & Fu, Y. (2026) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-026-04474-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Where available, integrating functional assays with TPMSC should be considered in future predictive models [21, 24].”
Sayegh, L., Shah, R. S., Shmoury, M., Depret-Bixio, L., & Fakih, M. H. (2024) · Arab Journal of Urology · doi:10.1080/20905998.2024.2327194 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“These results demonstrating no difference in pregnancy rate irrespective of morphology severity, are similar to those of Kohn et al. [9] Patel et al. [14] and Stanhiser et al. [11] however, they are contrary to the relatively old publications reporting that normal morphology is associated with…”
ResultPrathyusha, S., Kubera, N. S., Murugesan, S., Sharma, J. K., Venkatraman, S., & Ram, A. (2024) · Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_158_24 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Impacto de la morfología espermática en las tasas de embarazo con inseminación intrauterina
Orrego, J. G., Antonio Mackenna, I., Meza, J. E. S., Parraguez, V. O., Rojas, J. C., & Ceppi, C. P. (2022) · Revista Internacional de Andrología · doi:10.1016/j.androl.2021.04.007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rethinking the role of sperm morphology in clinical practice
Dubin, J. M., & Halpern, J. A. (2022) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2022.04.001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“In addition, for couples who do proceed to intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization, sperm morphology is not associated with clinical pregnancy (3, 4).”
BackgroundRe: Normal Ranges: Normal for Whom?
Niederberger, C. (2018) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.043
Cantó, J. G., Burriel, P. L. E., Catena, M. R. E., la Puerta, F. N. D., Bolufer, A. B. F., & Garcia, J. (2018) · Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medre.2018.10.002
Mu, X. L., Wang, H., Zhang, N., Wen, W., Wu, Q., Liu, P., & Shi, J.-Z. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-44759/v1
“Many factors have been veri ed to in uence the outcome of IUI-D, including the women’s age [7,8], an extreme body mass index, decreased ovarian reserve, primary infertility, unilateral tubal occlusion, pelvic adhesions and mild endometriosis [9-13], insemination times in a cycle [14] and semen factors (volume, motilit…”
BackgroundReproduktionsmedizinische Techniken: Indikationen, Durchführung und Chancen (VZO, IUI, IVF, ICSI)
Germeyer, A. (2021) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47329-0_27-1
Danny Mendoza, G., Catalina Hitchfeld, B., María Inés Luco, M., Francisco Vargas, B., & Rodrigo Carvajal, G. (2022) · Revista Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile · doi:10.5354/2735-7996.2022.69351
SPERM PARAMETERS' PREDICTIVE VALUE IN INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION SUCCESS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Afşin, M., Nursal, A. F., OTCU, S. M. Ö., Yavuz, D., & Ege, S. (2023) · Middle East Journal of Science · doi:10.51477/mejs.1367866
Zenoaga-Barbăroşie, C., & Martinez, M. P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55337-0_7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pavlovic, Z. J., Nemov, V. C., Sarkar, P., Jahandideh, S. S., Devine, K., & Imudia, A. N. (2024) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.043
Panken, E. J., & Halpern, J. A. (2024) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.047
Burks, H. R., Peck, J. D., Hansen, K. R., Stoner, J. A., & Craig, L. B. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317521
“A systematic review and meta-analysis did not demonstrate a relationship between morphology alone and IUI success and likely reflects this change over time [5].”
Bajaj, B., Narayan, R., Negi, R., Singh, L., Chauhan, S., & Kalita, B. (2025) · International Journal of Infertility & Fetal Medicine · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1378
Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Gao, H., Wu, X., Li, F., Zhang, W., Jiang, H., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2026.124222
Feng, K., Yin, H., Xu, Y., Wang, W., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1912464
“However, other studies have shown that these factors have no significant prognostic value (11).”
Two-Stage Probabilistic Classification of Sperm Identity and Morphology
Zayman, E., & İnceoğlu, F. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16203390
“The meta-analysis by Kohn et al. [47] supports not restricting IUI options solely on the basis of morphology under appropriate clinical conditions.”
- Authors
- Kohn, T. P., Kohn, J. R., & Ramasamy, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 812-822
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2767913496
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- sperm morphology, intrauterine insemination, pregnancy success, abnormal sperm morphology, male infertility, motile sperm count, assisted reproduction
- MeSH terms
- Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Male, Pregnancy, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Pregnancy Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review