Cited by 13Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesInflammatory Bowel DiseaseTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies

Prevalence and determinants of use of complementary and alternative medicine in a Canadian pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population

OTLEY, A, VERHOEF, M, BEST, A, HILSDEN, R·2001·Gastroenterology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-5085(01)81057-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OTLEY, A., VERHOEF, M., BEST, A., & HILSDEN, R.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
120
Issue
5
Pages
A213-A213
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059348126
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Keywords
complementary and alternative medicine, pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, CAM use prevalence, determinants of CAM use, parental influence, dietary therapy, age as predictor, treatment discontinuation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review