Cited by 161Heat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer MechanismsHeat Transfer and Numerical Methods

A generalized friction correlation for louver fin geometry

Chang, Yu-Juei, Hsu, Kuei-Chang, Lin, Yur-Tsai, Wang, Chi-Chuan·2000·International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0017-9310(99)00289-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chang, Y.-J., Hsu, K.-C., Lin, Y.-T., & Wang, C.-C.
Affiliations
Yuan Ze University (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chi-Chuan
Venue
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
2237-2243
ISSN
0017-9310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093344422
Cited by
161
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
Keywords
louver fins, entropy production, thermal entropy generation, heat exchangers, friction factor correlation, Reynolds number effects, desirability approach, heat transfer enhancement, pressure drop

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review