Cited by 103Heat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer MechanismsHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies

Experimental study on thermal–hydraulic performance of a wavy fin-and-flat tube aluminum heat exchanger

Dong, Junqi, Su, Lin, Chen, Qian, Xu, Weiwu·2013·Applied Thermal Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.09.018

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, J., Su, L., Chen, Q., & Xu, W.
Corresponding author
Dong, Junqi
Venue
Applied Thermal Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
51
Issue
1-2
Pages
32-39
ISSN
1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018302973
Cited by
103
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Keywords
aluminum heat exchangers, air-side heat transfer, pressure drop, thermal-hydraulic performance, fin length, Taguchi method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review