Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nuclear mechanisms of estrogen action. Effects of estradiol and anti-estrogens on estrogen receptors and nuclear receptor processing.

Open access
Horwitz, K.B., McGuire, W.L.·1978·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

This study attempted to show directly how antiestrogens (tamoxifen and nafoxidine) affect the estrogen receptor (ER) in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. The mechanisms of estrogen action through the unfilled ERs in both cytoplasm (Rc) and nuclei (Rn) of this cell line were contrasted with the effects of estradiol (E) and antiestrogens on receptor binding nuclear processing reactions and progesterone receptor (PgR) synthesis. Within 5 minutes E bound Rc and translocated it to the nucleus; E also bound Rn directly. Beginning 30 minutes after E and continuing for 3-5 hours a progressive depletion of about 70% of filled nuclear receptors (RnE) occurred without reappearance of unfilled receptor. From that point on the RnE levels stabilized a step coincident with PgR induction. The antiestrogens also bound Rc and Rn as demonstrated by in vitro competition studies and by exchange rates of tritiated E for ER complexed to antiestrogens in whole cells. However the nuclear antiestrogen receptor complexes were aberrantly processed; 3-5 hours after tamoxifen only 30% of nuclear-bound receptors were lost before nuclear receptor levels stabilized whereas nafoxidine-bound nuclear receptors were not processed at all. In spite of the only partial ER processing after tamoxifen PgR was induced as long as lower steady-state ER levels were maintained. When tamoxifen was removed total cell ERs returned to control levels as Rc were restored. Simultaneously PgR falls. Rc binding and translocation alone however are not sufficient for PgR induction since if nuclear processing fails PgR induction is prevented (as is the case with nafoxidine). These data suggest that nuclear processing steps may be integral to the function of estrogenic compounds as inducers of PgR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)34379-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Horwitz, K. B., & McGuire, W. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-11
Volume
253
Issue
22
Pages
8185-8191
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W167038568
Cited by
341
References
1
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear mechanisms of estrogen action. Effects of estradiol and anti-estrogens on estrogen receptors and nuclear receptor processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)34379-x
The paper
Horwitz, K. B., & McGuire, W. L. (1978). Nuclear mechanisms of estrogen action. Effects of estradiol and anti-estrogens on estrogen receptors and nuclear receptor processing. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)34379-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.