The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predominant osmotically active organic solutes in rat and rabbit renal medullas.
Open accessAbstract
The mechanism that concentrates the urine to an osmolality several times that of systemic plasma results in high concentrations of solutes (particularly NaCl and urea) in extracellular fluid of renal medulla, but not in the labyrinth of the renal cortex. Intracellular and extracellular osmolality must be equal in animals, but the known intracellular levels of Na and K salts and urea in renal medullas are much too low to balance the high extracellular osmolality. The purpose of these studies was to identify the other intracellular osmolytes that must be present. Cortexes and medullas from rabbit and rat kidneys were analyzed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry, and chemical assays to determine the identity and amount of organic solutes. Large amounts of glycerophosphorylcholine, betaine, sorbitol, and inositol were found in both species localized almost exclusively to the inner medulla. In rabbits during antidiuresis glycerophosphorylcholine, betaine, and sorbitol were present in the inner medulla, at concentrations of 21.1, 34.8, and 20.8 mumol/g wet weight, respectively, but were not detected in the cortex. Inositol was present in rabbit inner medulla at 10.7 mumol/g wet weight and was also present in the cortex, but at lower concentration. None of the above metabolites was present in measurable amounts in urine or peripheral plasma. The accumulation in the cells of the inner medulla of relatively large amounts of betaine, sorbitol, glycerophosphorylcholine and inositol during antidiuresis suggests that they may play a significant role in the maintenance of intracellular osmotic balance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional significance of cell volume regulatory mechanisms
LANG, F., BUSCH, G. L., RITTER, M., VÖLKL, H., WALDEGGER, S., GULBINS, E., & HÄUSSINGER, D. (1998) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.247 · Cited by 1,891
Physiology of cell volume regulation in vertebrates
Hoffmann, E. K., Lambert, I. H., & Pedersen, S. F. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00037.2007 · Cited by 1,441
Craig, S. A. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.3.539 · Cited by 1,062
Cloning of a Na(+)- and Cl(-)-dependent betaine transporter that is regulated by hypertonicity.
Yamauchi, A., Uchida, S., Kwon, H. M., Preston, A. S., Robey, R. B., Garcia-Perez, A., Burg, M. B., & Handler, J. S. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48543-2 · Cited by 398
Self-citationEverard, J. D., Gucci, R., Kann, S. C., Flore, J. A., & Loescher, W. H. (1994) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.1.281 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagnasco, S., Balaban, R., Fales, H. M., Yang, Y. M., & Burg, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5872-5877
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1577149434
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predominant osmotically active organic solutes in rat and rabbit renal medullas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38464-8
- The paper
- Bagnasco, S., Balaban, R., Fales, H. M., Yang, Y. M., & Burg, M. (1986). Predominant osmotically active organic solutes in rat and rabbit renal medullas. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38464-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.