Cited by 115Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Competition between motor molecules (kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein) and fibrous microtubule-associated proteins in binding to microtubules

Open access
Hagiwara, H., Yorifuji, H., Sato-Yoshitake, R., Hirokawa, N.·1994·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

In neuronal cells, microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) can be classified into two distinct groups. One consists of force-producing MAPs, the main components of which are kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein. The other is composed of fibrous MAPs, which include tau and MAP2. Many studies have been performed on the respective groups to understand their structures and functions. However, the problem of how the groups interact with each other on microtubules is still unresolved. To elucidate the interaction between kinesin or cytoplasmic dynein and tau or MAP2, we performed three experiments: competition, motility assay, and cosedimentation. To distinguish whether the binding competition is caused by steric hindrance of the projection domains of MAPs or by the competition of the binding sites on microtubules, we used microtubule binding domains of tau and MAP2 as well as native proteins. Our results revealed that kinesin or cytoplasmic dynein and tau or MAP2 complete for almost the same binding domains located on the carboxyl-terminal side of alpha- and the amino-terminal side of beta-tubulin from the site of subtilisin cleavage. Furthermore, the projection of tau, and probably of MAP2, might inhibit the binding of kinesin or cytoplasmic dynein to microtubules by steric hindrance. These findings will provide a useful step toward understanding the regulation system of intracellular organelle transport.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)41903-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagiwara, H., Yorifuji, H., Sato-Yoshitake, R., & Hirokawa, N.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-02
Volume
269
Issue
5
Pages
3581-3589
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1507877151
Cited by
115
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
kinesin, cytoplasmic dynein, microtubule-associated proteins, tau protein, MAP2, steric hindrance, neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding, Competitive, Brain, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, Cytoplasm, Dyneins, Kinetics, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Models, Structural, Protein Binding, Swine, Tubulin, Ultracentrifugation, Kinesins, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review