The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Poly (ADP-Ribose) synthetase. Separation and identification of three proteolytic fragments as the substrate-binding domain, the DNA-binding domain, and the automodification domain.
Open accessAbstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase of Mr = 120,000 is cleaved by limited proteolysis with alpha-chymotrypsin into two fragments of Mr = 54,000 (54K) and Mr = 66,000 (66K). When the native enzyme is modified with 3-(bromoacetyl)pyridine, both portions of the enzyme are alkylated; however, alkylation of the 54K portions of the enzyme is protected by the addition of the substrate, NAD, or its analog, nicotinamide, suggesting that the substrate-binding site is localized in the 54K fragment. When the enzyme previously automodified with a low concentration of [adenine-U-14C] NAD is digested with alpha-chymotrypsin, the radioactivity is detected exclusively in the 66K fragment. The 66K fragment thus labeled is further cleaved with papain into two fragments of Mr = 46,000 and Mr = 22,000. With these two fragments, the label is detected only in the 22K fragment, but not in the 46K fragment. The 46K fragment binds to a DNA-cellulose column with the same affinity as that of the native enzyme, while the 22K fragment and the 54K fragment have little affinity for the DNA ligand. These results indicate that poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase contains three separable domains, the first possessing the site for binding of the substrate, NAD, the second containing the site for binding of DNA, and the third acting as the site(s) for accepting poly(ADP-ribose).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling
Ray Chaudhuri, A., & Nussenzweig, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.53 · Cited by 1,786
Cantó, C., Menzies, K. J., & Auwerx, J. (2015) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.023 · Cited by 1,648
PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond
Rouleau, M., Patel, A., Hendzel, M. J., Kaufmann, S. H., & Poirier, G. G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2812 · Cited by 1,298
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 cleavage during apoptosis: An update
Soldani, C., & Scovassi, A. I. (2002) · Apoptosis · doi:10.1023/a:1016119328968 · Cited by 697
Parthanatos: mitochondrial‐linked mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities
Fatokun, A. A., Dawson, V. L., & Dawson, T. M. (2014) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12416 · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Kameshita, I., Matsuda, Z., Taniguchi, T., & Shizuta, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 259
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4770-4776
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1549011458
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poly (ADP-Ribose) synthetase. Separation and identification of three proteolytic fragments as the substrate-binding domain, the DNA-binding domain, and the automodification domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)42913-9
- The paper
- Kameshita, I., Matsuda, Z., Taniguchi, T., & Shizuta, Y. (1984). Poly (ADP-Ribose) synthetase. Separation and identification of three proteolytic fragments as the substrate-binding domain, the DNA-binding domain, and the automodification domain. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)42913-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.