Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular characterization of phagosomes.

Open access
Desjardins, M, Celis, J E, van Meer, G, Dieplinger, H, Jahraus, A, Griffiths, G, Huber, L A·1994·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The transformation of newly formed phagosomes into mature phagolysosomes is a process that involves a complex series of interactions between phagosomes and other vacuolar organelles. The machinery required by phagosomes to mediate these interactions is poorly understood. In this study, we allowed human and various rodent cells to take up latex beads whose density facilitates a simple purification of phagosomes using discontinuous sucrose gradients. With this system, we initiated a systematic study of phagosome proteins using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and the currently available two-dimensional gel protein data bases. By this approach, we were able to recognize a group of polypeptides associated with mouse J774 phagosomes-phagolysosomes including annexin II, annexin VI, the beta-1 and beta-2 subunits of trimeric G proteins, and a group of actin-binding proteins. While the amount of annexin II associated to phagosomes was similar at all times of latex internalization, the levels of annexin VI were higher on late phagosomes. Phospholipid analysis of J774 phagosomes isolated at early and late time points during phagolysosome formation also revealed significant differences in their lipid composition. In the human phagosomes, we resolved over 200 polypeptides on the two-dimensional gels. These included the proteins described in the mouse, as well as 32 polypeptides that were found to be highly enriched in phagosomes, 15 of which are not present in the current data bases. The results demonstrate that the use of latex bead phagosomes is a powerful system to identify key molecules involved in phagolysosome biogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)31620-x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Desjardins, M., Celis, J. E., van Meer, G., Dieplinger, H., Jahraus, A., Griffiths, G., & Huber, L. A.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-12
Volume
269
Issue
51
Pages
32194-32200
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1569534262
Cited by
284
References
43
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular characterization of phagosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)31620-x
The paper
Desjardins, M., Celis, J. E., van Meer, G., Dieplinger, H., Jahraus, A., Griffiths, G., & Huber, L. A. (1994). Molecular characterization of phagosomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)31620-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.