The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tissue sites of degradation of apoprotein A-I in the rat.
Open accessAbstract
The tissue sites of degradation of apoprotein A-I were determined in the rat in vivo using a newly developed tracer of protein catabolism, an adduct of 125I-tyramine and cellobiose. This methodology takes advantage of the fact that when a protein labeled with 125I-tyramine-cellobiose is taken up and degraded, the radiolabeled ligand remains trapped intracellularly. Thus, radio-iodine accumulation in a tissue acts as a cumulative measure of protein degradation in that tissue. In the present studies, apoprotein AI (apo-A-I) was labeled with tyramine-cellobiose (TC). The TC-labeled apo-A-I was then reassociated with high density lipoprotein (HDL) in vivo by injection into donor animals. After 30 min, serum from donor animals was recovered and then injected into recipient rats. TC-labeled apo-A-I in the donor serum was shown to be exclusively associated with HDL. The fractional catabolic rate of 125I-TC-apo-A-I was not significantly different from that of conventionally labeled apo-A-I. The kidney was the major site of degradation, accounting for 39% of the total. The liver was responsible for 26% of apo-A-I catabolism, 96% of which occurred in hepatocytes. The kidney was also the most active organ of catabolism/g of wet weight. The tissues next most active/g of wet weight were ovary and adrenal, a finding that is compatible with a special role of HDL in the rat for delivery of cholesterol for steroidogenesis. Immunofluorescence studies of frozen sections of rat kidney demonstrated the presence of apo-A-I on the brush-border and in apical granules of proximal tubule epithelial cells. Preliminary studies using HDL labeled both with 125I-TC-apo-A-I and [3H]cholesteryl ethers again demonstrated high rates of renal uptake of apo-A-I but less than 1% of total ether uptake. It is postulated that the high activity of kidney was not due to uptake of intact HDL particles, but rather, due to glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption of free apo-A-I.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dietschy, J., Turley, S., & Spady, D. (1993) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)35728-x · Cited by 874
Timmins, J. M., Lee, J.-Y., Boudyguina, E., Kluckman, K. D., Brunham, L. R., Mulya, A., Gebre, A. K., Coutinho, J. M., Colvin, P. L., Smith, T. L., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci23915 · Cited by 447
Zlokovic, B. V., Martel, C. L., Matsubara, E., McComb, J. G., Zheng, G., McCluskey, R. T., Frangione, B., & Ghiso, J. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.9.4229 · Cited by 430
[1] Introduction to the plasma lipoproteins
Gotto, A. M., Pownall, H. J., & Havel, R. J. (1986) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(86)28061-1 · Cited by 421
Horowitz, B. S., Goldberg, I. J., Merab, J., Vanni, T. M., Ramakrishnan, R., & Ginsberg, H. N. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116384 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, C. K., Pittman, R. C., Keller, G. A., & Steinberg, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 7161-7167
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1596523068
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tissue sites of degradation of apoprotein A-I in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32346-9
- The paper
- Glass, C. K., Pittman, R. C., Keller, G. A., & Steinberg, D. (1983). Tissue sites of degradation of apoprotein A-I in the rat. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32346-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.