The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NAD(+)-dependent repair of damaged DNA by human cell extracts.
Open accessAbstract
Rejoining of DNA single-strand breaks generated by treatment of plasmids with gamma-rays, neocarzinostatin, or bleomycin was catalyzed inefficiently by human cell extracts. The reaction was strongly promoted by the addition of NAD+, which was employed for rapid and transient synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose). The DNA rejoining reaction was accompanied by DNA repair replication, apparently due to replacement of damaged residues at termini. Selective depletion of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase from cell extracts improved the repair of DNA exposed to a variety of DNA-damaging agents by removing the NAD+ dependence of the repair reaction. NAD(+)-promoted DNA repair by soluble cell extracts also occurred with alkylated DNA as substrate and was suppressed by 3-aminobenzamide. A similar stimulatory effect by NAD+ was observed for repair of ultraviolet-irradiated DNA, and this could be ascribed to the presence of pyrimidine hydrates as minor radiation-induced DNA lesions. No effect was observed on the sealing of gamma-irradiated DNA by supplementation of cell extracts with purified mammalian DNA ligase I or DNA ligase II. The results indicate that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase interferes with base excision-repair processes because bound enzyme molecules block DNA strand interruptions. Release of bound poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase following automodification, or physical removal of the protein from reaction mixtures, facilitates DNA repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enzyme action at 3' termini of ionizing radiation-induced DNA strand breaks.
Henner, W. D., Grunberg, S. M., & Haseltine, W. A. (1983) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)43793-8 · Cited by 173
Cited by
WISEMAN, H., & HALLIWELL, B. (1996) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3130017 · Cited by 2,345
Cuzzocrea, S., Riley, D. P., Caputi, A. P., & Salvemini, D. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01484-4 · Cited by 1,087
NAD+ metabolism: pathophysiologic mechanisms and therapeutic potential
Xie, N., Zhang, L., Gao, W., Huang, C., Huber, P. E., Zhou, X., Li, C., Shen, G., & Zou, B. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00311-7 · Cited by 1,052
Mice lacking ADPRT and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation develop normally but are susceptible to skin disease.
Wang, Z. Q., Auer, B., Stingl, L., Berghammer, H., Haidacher, D., Schweiger, M., & Wagner, E. F. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.5.509 · Cited by 774
Povirk, L. F. (1996) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/0027-5107(96)00023-1 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Satoh, M. S., Poirier, G. G., & Lindahl, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5480-5487
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1513191136
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NAD(+)-dependent repair of damaged DNA by human cell extracts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53346-9
- The paper
- Satoh, M. S., Poirier, G. G., & Lindahl, T. (1993). NAD(+)-dependent repair of damaged DNA by human cell extracts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53346-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.