Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A REFERENCE BASE AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONSTITUENTS

Open access
Lilienthal, J.L., Zierler, K.L., Folk, B.P., Buka, R., Riley, Mary J.·1950·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Analyses of tissue constituents are expressed conventionally with reference to one or more characteristics or components of the tissue itself. The following measurements comprise the usual references: wet weight, dry weight (total or fat-free), total nitrogen, phosphorus or carbon. For analysis of normal tissue any one of these references provides a useful means of estimating comparative concentrations. In analyses of abnormal tissue, however, the use of such a reference base may provide data which are grossly misleading. For example, it seems more than likely that abnormal concentrations of creatine phosphate reported to exist in muscle samples removed from patients with dystrophy are owing largely to the fact that 1 unit volume of dystrophic muscle may contain only a fraction of the mass of muscle fiber found in normal muscle; the remainder of the mass is composed largely of fat and collagen which do not contain significant amounts of creatine (1). Hoagland summarized the problem thus. “The problem of adequate bases of reference for constituents of diseased tissue in general is one of the principal barriers to the development of a rational discipline of chemical pathology. It is becoming increasingly evident that practical methods for determination of the residual mass of parenchymal cells of affected organs will have to he devised before full consideration can be given to possible alterat,ions in concentrations of enzymes, substrates, metabolites, and metallic catalysts occurring in tissue as a result of affection by disease. Since, in the chemical analysis of diseased organs, we are going to be faced constantly with the need of knowing the net quantities of various tissue constituents, it is safe to assume that increasing attention will be paid in the future to the problem of the relation of the concentration of tissue constituents to differential cellular mass” (2). Hoagland and his collaborators attacked the problem as it concerns muscle analysis by developing a technique for estimating the myosin content of the muscle sample as a reference base which is related directly

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56484-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Lilienthal, J. L., Zierler, K. L., Folk, B. P., Buka, R., & Riley, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1950-02
Volume
182
Issue
2
Pages
501-508
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1578156381
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A REFERENCE BASE AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONSTITUENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56484-x
The paper
Lilienthal, J. L., Zierler, K. L., Folk, B. P., Buka, R., & Riley, M. J. (1950). A REFERENCE BASE AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONSTITUENTS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56484-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.