The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A REFERENCE BASE AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONSTITUENTS
Open accessAbstract
Analyses of tissue constituents are expressed conventionally with reference to one or more characteristics or components of the tissue itself. The following measurements comprise the usual references: wet weight, dry weight (total or fat-free), total nitrogen, phosphorus or carbon. For analysis of normal tissue any one of these references provides a useful means of estimating comparative concentrations. In analyses of abnormal tissue, however, the use of such a reference base may provide data which are grossly misleading. For example, it seems more than likely that abnormal concentrations of creatine phosphate reported to exist in muscle samples removed from patients with dystrophy are owing largely to the fact that 1 unit volume of dystrophic muscle may contain only a fraction of the mass of muscle fiber found in normal muscle; the remainder of the mass is composed largely of fat and collagen which do not contain significant amounts of creatine (1). Hoagland summarized the problem thus. “The problem of adequate bases of reference for constituents of diseased tissue in general is one of the principal barriers to the development of a rational discipline of chemical pathology. It is becoming increasingly evident that practical methods for determination of the residual mass of parenchymal cells of affected organs will have to he devised before full consideration can be given to possible alterat,ions in concentrations of enzymes, substrates, metabolites, and metallic catalysts occurring in tissue as a result of affection by disease. Since, in the chemical analysis of diseased organs, we are going to be faced constantly with the need of knowing the net quantities of various tissue constituents, it is safe to assume that increasing attention will be paid in the future to the problem of the relation of the concentration of tissue constituents to differential cellular mass” (2). Hoagland and his collaborators attacked the problem as it concerns muscle analysis by developing a technique for estimating the myosin content of the muscle sample as a reference base which is related directly
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carnitine Deficiency of Human Skeletal Muscle with Associated Lipid Storage Myopathy: A New Syndrome
Engel, A. G., & Angelini, C. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.179.4076.899 · Cited by 512
A selective defect of cytochrome c oxidase is present in brain of Alzheimer disease patients
Maurer, I. (2000) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00112-3 · Cited by 475
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy
Herrera, E., Knopp, R. H., & Freinkel, N. (1969) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci106192 · Cited by 379
Muscle composition in relation to age and sex
Forsberg, A. M., Nilsson, E., Werneman, J., Bergström, J., & Hultman, E. (1991) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0810249 · Cited by 282
Rebouche, C. J. (1983) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/113.10.1906 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Lilienthal, J. L., Zierler, K. L., Folk, B. P., Buka, R., & Riley, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1950-02
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 501-508
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1578156381
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A REFERENCE BASE AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONSTITUENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56484-x
- The paper
- Lilienthal, J. L., Zierler, K. L., Folk, B. P., Buka, R., & Riley, M. J. (1950). A REFERENCE BASE AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONSTITUENTS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56484-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.