The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Utility of Superoxide Dismutase in Studying Free Radical Reactions
Open accessAbstract
The superoxide dismutase (dismutase) which has already been found to be useful in detecting the role of O2·- in certain enzymic reactions has here been shown to be applicable to the study of nonenzymic reactions, as well. The aerobic oxidation of sulfate, which proceeds by a free radical chain mechanism, has been investigated with the aid of superoxide dismutase. The spontaneous oxidation of sulfite, which is catalyzed by traces of heavy metals, was unaffected by superoxide dismutase in the absence of ethylenediaminetetraacetate yet was inhibited by 1 ng per ml levels of the dismutase in the presence of EDTA. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has been found to be a powerful catalyst of the aerobic oxidation of sulfite. This is a complex reaction with a mechanism which appears to change with changes in the relative concentrations of sulfite and of DMSO. When the ratio of [sulfite] to [DMSO] was high, sulfite oxidation was inhibited by dismutase. In contrast, when the ratio of [sulfite] to [DMSO] was low, dismutase stimulated the oxidation of sulfite. The effects of variation of the concentrationn of sulfite, DMSO, and oxygen on the DMSO-induced sulfite oxidation have been explored. DMSO was found to contain approximately 0.2% of an impurity which was a very effective radical scavenger. This impurity could not be eliminated by treatment with charcoal and vacuum distillation, but it could be destroyed by treatment with H2O2. The reduction of cytochrome c by sulfite and the effects of EDTA, DMSO, oxygen, and dismutase on this reduction have also been studied. The results, which have permitted clarifying deductions concerning these very complex reactions, could not have been achieved, were the superoxide dismutase not available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Repertoires of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Ocular Diseases
Li, Y.-J., Jiang, Q., Cao, G.-F., Yao, J., & Yan, B. (2015) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000373980 · Cited by 16,304
Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels
Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8 · Cited by 12,892
Self-citationMisra, H. P., & Fridovich, I. (1972) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)45228-9 · Cited by 9,097
Self-citationAntioxidant defence mechanisms: From the beginning to the end (of the beginning)
Halliwell, B. (1999) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.1080/10715769900300841 · Cited by 1,020
Tarpey, M. M., Wink, D. A., & Grisham, M. B. (2004) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00361.2003 · Cited by 673
Metadata
- Authors
- McCord, J. M., & Fridovich, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1969-11
- Volume
- 244
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6056-6063
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1604764621
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Utility of Superoxide Dismutase in Studying Free Radical Reactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63505-7
- The paper
- McCord, J. M., & Fridovich, I. (1969). The Utility of Superoxide Dismutase in Studying Free Radical Reactions. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63505-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.