Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 613

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif

Open access
Brennan, R G, Matthews, B W·1989·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

One of the most striking findings to emerge from the determinations of the structures of Cro, CAP, and X-repressor (1-3) was that these three sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins had in common a substructure now named the helix-turn-helix motif. The apparent importance of this motif was suggested not only by its striking similarity in the respective structures (4,5) but also from amino acid sequence comparisons (6-11) which indicated that a similar motif might occur in other DNA-biding proteins. It was proposed (1,3, 12-14) that the helix-turn-helix motif interacts with operator DNA in a manner simiiar to that shown in Fig. 1 for Cro. Recognition of a specific sequence on DNA was thought to be achieved by a network of hydrogen bonds and other contacts between the side chains of the protein and the parts of the base pairs exposed within the grooves of the DNA. The second helix of the helix-turn-helix motif, which was thought to bind withii the major groove of the DNA, was presumed to be especially important in recognition. The importance of the helix-turn-helix motif in DNA-protein interaction has been supported by a wealth of biochemical and genetic evidence (e.g. see Refs. 15-18) and has now been shown directly by recent structure determinations of a number of complexes of repressor proteins with synthetic operators. These include the DNA-binding domains of the repressors of phage 434 (19,20) and phage X (21), Cro protein from phage 434 (22), and trp repressor from Escherichia coli (23). In each case the helix-turn-helix motif is an integral part of the protein-DNA interface with the second a-helix (the “recognition helix”) located within the major groove of the DNA (cf. Fig. 1). The purpose of this report is not o review, in detail, the structures of these repressor-operator complexes. Rather, we will first discuss the use of amino acid sequence comparisons to locate putative helixturn-helix motifs. Then we will review the structural correspondence between known helii-turn-helix units. Finally, the role of the heliiturn-helix in recognition of sequence-specific binding sites on DNA will be evaluated in light of the recently defined repressor-operator complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)94115-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 613

Metadata

Authors
Brennan, R. G., & Matthews, B. W.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-02
Volume
264
Issue
4
Pages
1903-1906
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1555187143
Cited by
613
References
0
FWCI
29.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)94115-3
The paper
Brennan, R. G., & Matthews, B. W. (1989). The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)94115-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.