Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation.

Open access
Hershko, A·1988·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A large part of cellular proteins are in a dynamic state of turnover. Protein breakdown is responsible for essential cellular functions such as the modulation of the levels of key enzymes and regulatory proteins and removal of abnormal proteins that arise by biosynthetic errors or postsynthetic damages. The proc- ess is highly selective: the half-lives of individual proteins vary from several minutes to many days (1,2). The biochemical mechanisms of intracellular protein break- down remained obscure for a long time. An unusual mechanism was suggested by observations that it has an absolute requirement for cellular energy (3, 4). Significant progress in the elucidation of the mechanisms of energy-dependent protein breakdown has begun only in the last decade. Available information indicates diversity of mechanisms for protein degradation. The degree of functioning of the various pathways may depend upon specific cell types and changingphysiological situations. Under conditions of nutritional or hormonal deprivation, lysosomal autophagy is greatly accelerated. Lysosomal protein breakdown appears to be largely nonselective, although it has been suggested that certain proteins are targeted to the lysosome by specific amino acid sequences (5). Among cytosolic pathways of protein breakdown, some proteins may be degraded by ATP-dependent proteases such as those described in bacteria (6, 7). Another major system for selective protein degradation is the ubiquitin pathway, in which proteins are committed to degradation by their ligation to ubiquitin, a highly conserved 76-amino acid polypeptide. The objective of this Minireview is to summarize briefly what we have learned and to point out what we yet have to learn about the mode of action of the ubiquitin-mediated protein breakdown system. For more detailed description of the literature, the reader is referred to several earlier reviews (8-ll), a recent book (12), and symposium (13).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)37575-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Hershko, A.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-10
Volume
263
Issue
30
Pages
15237-15240
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1529813906
Cited by
450
References
0
FWCI
19.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)37575-1
The paper
Hershko, A. (1988). Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)37575-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.