The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aggregation of Cartilage Proteoglycans
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Viscosimetric and centrifugal analyses of nasal and tracheal proteoglycan preparations indicate that: a, the proteoglycan molecules from both cartilages have very similar physical properties (limiting viscosity numbers of 140 and 145 ml per g and s0 values of 25 and 20 S, respectively); b, about 80% of the proteoglycan molecules in each preparation can form aggregates; and c, the aggregates are much larger in nasal than in tracheal preparations (s0 values of 93 and 43 S, respectively). Hyaluronic acid is present at a concentration of 0.4 to 0.8% (w/w) in nasal proteoglycan aggregate preparations. Evidence is presented which suggests that the hyaluronic acid-proteoglycan interactions described by Hardingham and Muir ((1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 279, 401) are involved in aggregate formation and that the relative sizes of the aggregates are probably determined by the relative sizes of the hyaluronic acid molecules. Mild proteolysis of proteoglycan aggregates with papain removes the chondroitin sulfate and keratan sulfate from the aggregates while leaving about 25% of the total protein still bound to hyaluronic acid. This bound protein fraction was separated from the hyaluronic acid by chromatography on Sephadex G-200 with 4 m guanidine hydrochloride as the solvent. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis indicated that this fraction contains two proteins (molecular weights approximately 40,000 and 65,000) both of which are reduced to smaller peptide fragments when treated with β-mercaptoethanol. The two proteins retain their ability to bind to hyaluronic acid. The interactions between the proteins and the hyaluronic acid in the intact aggregates partially protect the hyaluronic acid from digestion with bacterial chondroitinase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The specific interaction of hyaluronic acid with cartilage proteoglycans.
HARDINGHAM, T., & MUIR, H. (1972) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/0304-4165(72)90160-2 · Cited by 645
Cited by
Proteoglycans in the Developing Brain: New Conceptual Insights for Old Proteins
Bandtlow, C. E., & Zimmermann, D. R. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1267 · Cited by 632
Extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in CNS repair
Kwok, J. C. F., Dick, G., Wang, D., & Fawcett, J. W. (2011) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.20974 · Cited by 395
The perineuronal net and the control of CNS plasticity
Wang, D., & Fawcett, J. (2012) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-012-1375-y · Cited by 373
The Content and Size of Hyaluronan in Biological Fluids and Tissues
Cowman, M. K., Lee, H.-G., Schwertfeger, K. L., McCarthy, J. B., & Turley, E. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00261 · Cited by 346
Kohda, D., Morton, C. J., Parkar, A. A., Hatanaka, H., Inagaki, F. M., Campbell, I. D., & Day, A. J. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80151-8 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Hascall, V. C., & Heinegård, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1974-07
- Volume
- 249
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4232-4241
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1544761069
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggregation of Cartilage Proteoglycans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)42507-6
- The paper
- Hascall, V. C., & Heinegård, D. (1974). Aggregation of Cartilage Proteoglycans. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)42507-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.