The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human strand-specific mismatch repair occurs by a bidirectional mechanism similar to that of the bacterial reaction
Open accessAbstract
Nuclear extracts prepared from a HeLa cell line have been previously shown to support strand-specific repair of heteroduplex DNAs containing a site-specific, strand-specific incision (Holmes, J.J., Clark, S., and Modrich, P. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 5837-5841; Thomas, D.C., Roberts, J.D., and Kunkel, T.A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3744-3751). Further analysis of the substrate specificity of the reaction has shown that in addition to G-T, A-C, G-G, and C-C, nuclear extracts also recognize and correct in a strand-specific manner A-A, A-G, T-T, and C-T mismatches, with repair in each case being inhibited by aphidicolin. The rate of repair of a circular G-T heteroduplex was found to decrease monotonically with increasing separation between the mismatch and the strand break that targets repair, as viewed along the shorter path joining the two sites in the circular substrate. This decrease is independent of the polarity of the incised strand, suggesting that the human pathway of mismatch correction may possess a bidirectional excision capability similar to that of the Escherichia coli methyl-directed system. This possibility was confirmed by analysis of excision tracts associated with the reaction. Inhibition of DNA synthesis by aphidicolin or by omission of exogenous dNTPs leads to the mismatch-provoked formation of a single-strand gap that spans the shorter path between the strand break and the mismatch, irrespective of the polarity of the incised strand. Formation of these gaps, which extend from the site of the strand break to terminate at a number of discrete sites in the region 90 to 170 nucleotides beyond the mismatch, is therefore independent of the relative orientation of the two sites. Based on similar mismatch specificities and common features of mechanism, we have concluded that the human strand-specific mismatch repair system is functionally homologous to the bacterial methyl-directed pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The multifaceted mismatch-repair system
Jiricny, J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1907 · Cited by 1,370
DNA Mismatch Repair: Functions and Mechanisms
Iyer, R. R., Pluciennik, A., Burdett, V., & Modrich, P. L. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0404794 · Cited by 905
Self-citationDNA MISMATCH REPAIR AND GENETIC INSTABILITY
Harfe, B. D., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.359 · Cited by 608
Isolation of an hMSH2-p160 Heterodimer That Restores DNA Mismatch Repair to Tumor Cells
Drummond, J. T., Li, G.-M., Longley, M. J., & Modrich, P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7604264 · Cited by 601
Self-citationBiochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair.
Kolodner, R. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.12.1433 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, W. H., & Modrich, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 11838-11844
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1582040861
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human strand-specific mismatch repair occurs by a bidirectional mechanism similar to that of the bacterial reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50276-9
- The paper
- Fang, W. H., & Modrich, P. (1993). Human strand-specific mismatch repair occurs by a bidirectional mechanism similar to that of the bacterial reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50276-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.