Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Equilibrium constants for the binding of fatty acids with fatty acid-binding proteins from adipocyte, intestine, heart, and liver measured with the fluorescent probe ADIFAB.

Open access
Richieri, G.V., Ogata, R.T., Kleinfeld, A.M.·1994·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Affinities of long chain fatty acids (FA) for fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) have been measured by monitoring the concentrations of the unbound or free fatty acids (FFA) in equilibrium with the FABPs using the fluorescent probe ADIFAB. This probe allows the measurement of the concentration of FFA in equilibrium with FABPs, without physical separation of any of the reactants. Equilibrium characteristics were measured at 37 degrees C for palmitate, stearate, oleate, linoleate, linolenate, and arachidonate binding to six FABPs from intestine, heart, adipose, and liver from different species. Equilibrium constants for each FA were found to be extremely sensitive to the tissue origin of the FABP but largely independent of species differences. The measured values of the dissociation constants (Kd) ranged from about 2 to 1000 nM, depending upon the tissue origin of the FABP and the FA. Binding constants for some FABPs varied considerably with different FA, as much as 80-fold in the case of the intestinal FABP. In contrast, Kd values for adipocyte FABPs exhibited less than 4-fold variation with FA type and are generally larger (lower affinities) than for the other FABPs. For all FABPs, Kd values for fatty acids with the same chain length were considerably lower for saturated as compared to polyunsaturated FA. This characteristic likely reflects the lower aqueous solubilities of the saturated fatty acids. In contrast to the other FABPs, rat liver FABP was found to have two FA-binding sites/monomer. Each of these two sites had similar high affinities for the saturated FA, while for the unsaturated FA the two sites exhibited affinities that differ by more than 7-fold. This study disagrees with earlier investigations in finding that equilibrium binding of FA to FABPs is a sensitive function of FA type and FABP tissue origin and that FA-FABP dissociation constants are submicromolar. These results provide a framework with which to understand better the biological function of FABPs and the FA-FABP interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)51026-2

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Richieri, G. V., Ogata, R. T., & Kleinfeld, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-09
Volume
269
Issue
39
Pages
23918-23930
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1505147288
Cited by
291
References
39
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Equilibrium constants for the binding of fatty acids with fatty acid-binding proteins from adipocyte, intestine, heart, and liver measured with the fluorescent probe ADIFAB. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)51026-2
The paper
Richieri, G. V., Ogata, R. T., & Kleinfeld, A. M. (1994). Equilibrium constants for the binding of fatty acids with fatty acid-binding proteins from adipocyte, intestine, heart, and liver measured with the fluorescent probe ADIFAB. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)51026-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.