The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ENZYME SECRETION AND THE INCORPORATION OF P32 INTO PHOSPHOLIPIDES OF PANCREAS SLICES
Open accessAbstract
1. When enzyme secretion was stimulated by carbamylcholine or acetylcholine (with eserine) in slices of pigeon pancreas, the incorporation of P32 into the phospholipide fraction of the stimulated slices was, after 2 hours, 4.8 to 8.7 (average, 7.0) times greater than the incorporation of P32 into the phospholipides of control slices. Neither respiration nor the incorporation of P32 into acid-soluble phosphate esters was increased. 2. Pilocarpine, which on a weight for weight basis was much less effective than carbamylcholine or acetylcholine in stimulating enzyme secretion in pancreas slices, was also much less effective in stimulating the uptake of P32 into phospholipides. 3. The stimulatory effects of carbamylcholine on both enzyme secretion and the incorporation of P32 into phospholipides were abolished by atropine. 4. The specific activity of the phospholipides from slices incubated anaerobically was less than 5 per cent of that observed aerobically. Anaerobically, carbamylcholine did not stimulate the incorporation of P32 into phospholipides to any significant extent. The specific activity of the acid-soluble phosphate esters after anaerobic incubation was 34 per cent of that found aerobically. 5. Cholinergic drugs had little or no effect on the incorporation of P32 into the phospholipides of the following tissue slices: pigeon and guinea pig liver, guinea pig heart ventricle, pigeon gizzard (smooth muscle), and guinea pig kidney cortex. A relatively slight stimulation of P32 uptake into phospholipides was observed in slices of pigeon brain (65 per cent) and guinea pig brain cortex (40 per cent). 6. Stimulation of amylase synthesis in slices of pigeon pancreas by the addition of a mixture of amino acids had no effect on the incorporation of P32 into phospholipides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inositol Trisphosphate, a Novel Second Messenger in Cellular Signal Transduction
Berridge, M. J., & Irvine, R. F. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/312315a0 · Cited by 6,086
Phosphoinositides: Tiny Lipids With Giant Impact on Cell Regulation
Balla, T. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2012 · Cited by 1,638
Chemistry and metabolism of lipids in the vertebrate retina
Fliesler, A. J., & Anderson, R. E. (1983) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/0163-7827(83)90004-8 · Cited by 1,052
Wolfe, L. S. (1982) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb10847.x · Cited by 573
Multiple roles of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C isozymes
Suh, P.-G., Park, J.-I., Manzoli, L., Cocco, L., Peak, J. C., Katan, M., Fukami, K., Kataoka, T., Yun, S.-U., & Ryu, S.-H. (2008) · BMB Reports · doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2008.41.6.415 · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- Hokin, M. R., & Hokin, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1953-08
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 967-977
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1538989554
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ENZYME SECRETION AND THE INCORPORATION OF P32 INTO PHOSPHOLIPIDES OF PANCREAS SLICES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52367-5
- The paper
- Hokin, M. R., & Hokin, L. E. (1953). ENZYME SECRETION AND THE INCORPORATION OF P32 INTO PHOSPHOLIPIDES OF PANCREAS SLICES. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52367-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.