Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of the carbohydrate receptor for Shiga toxin produced by Shigella dysenteriae type 1.

Open access
Lindberg, A A, Brown, J E, Strömberg, N, Westling-Ryd, M, Schultz, J E, Karlsson, K A·1987·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The binding of Shiga toxin isolated from the bacterium Shigella dysenteriae type 1 to a series of glycolipids and to cells or cell homogenates has been studied. Bound toxin was detected using either 125I-labeled toxin or specific monoclonal antibody and 125I-labeled anti-antibody. Overlay of toxin on thin-layer chromatograms with separated glycolipids and binding to glycolipids coated in microtiter wells established that the toxin specifically bound to Gal alpha 1-4Gal beta (galabiose) placed terminally or internally in the oligosaccharide chain. No glycolipid shown to lack this sequence binds the toxin. Most of the glycolipids with internally placed galabiose were not active, indicating a sterical hindrance for toxin access to the binding epitope. Binding of toxin to HeLa cells in monolayers could be inhibited by preincubation of the toxin with galabiose covalently linked to bovine serum albumin (BSA), but not with free oligosaccharides containing galabiose or with lactose coupled to BSA. This demonstrated that the inhibition is specifically dependent on galabiose and requires multivalency of the disaccharide to be efficient. The inhibitory effect was successively enhanced by increasing the substitution on BSA (7, 18, and 25 mol of galabiose/mol of BSA). The BSA-coupled galabiose could also prevent the cytotoxic effect on HeLa cells (detachment of killed cells). There are cell lines with a dense number of receptor sites, but which are resistant to toxin action (uptake and inhibition of protein synthesis) which may suggest two types of receptor substances which are functionally different and unevenly expressed. In analogy with the mechanism earlier formulated for cholera toxin, we propose glycolipid-bound, bilayer-close galabiose as the functional receptor for membrane penetration of the toxin, while galabiose bound in glycoproteins affords binding sites but is not able to mediate penetration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)75706-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Lindberg, A. A., Brown, J. E., Strömberg, N., Westling-Ryd, M., Schultz, J. E., & Karlsson, K. A.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-02
Volume
262
Issue
4
Pages
1779-1785
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1641182372
Cited by
451
References
21
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of the carbohydrate receptor for Shiga toxin produced by Shigella dysenteriae type 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)75706-8
The paper
Lindberg, A. A., Brown, J. E., Strömberg, N., Westling-Ryd, M., Schultz, J. E., & Karlsson, K. A. (1987). Identification of the carbohydrate receptor for Shiga toxin produced by Shigella dysenteriae type 1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)75706-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.