The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Codon selection in yeast.
Open accessAbstract
Extreme codon bias is seen for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes for the fermentative alcohol dehydrogenase isozyme I (ADH-I) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Over 98% of the 1004 amino acid residues analyzed by DNA sequencing are coded for by a select 25 of the 61 possible coding triplets. These preferred codons tend to be highly homologous to the anticodons of the major yeast isoacceptor tRNA species. Codons which necessitate site by side GC base pairs between the codons and the tRNA anticodons are always avoided whenever possible. Codons containing 100% G, C, A, U, GC, or AU are also avoided. This provides for approximately equivalent codon-anticodon binding energies for all preferred triplets. All sequenced yeast genes show a distinct preference for these same 25 codons. The degree of preference varies from greater than 90% for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ADH-I to less than 20% for iso-2 cytochrome c. The degree of bias for these 25 preferred triplets in each gene is correlated with the level of its mRNA in the cytoplasm. Genes which are strongly expressed are more biased than genes with a lower level of expression. A similar phenomenon is observed in the codon preferences of highly expressed genes in Escherichia coli. High levels of gene expression are well correlated with high levels of codon bias toward 22 of the 61 coding triplets. As in yeast, these preferred codons are highly complementary to the major cellular isoacceptor tRNA species. In at least four cases (Ala, Arg, Leu, and Val), these preferred E. coli codons are incompatible with the preferred yeast codons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992
Correlation between Protein and mRNA Abundance in Yeast
Gygi, S. P., Rochon, Y., Franza, B. R., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.3.1720 · Cited by 3,819
Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale
Greenbaum, D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-117 · Cited by 1,692
The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression
Ellegren, H., & Parsch, J. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2167 · Cited by 925
Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: Natural selection and translational accuracy
Akashi, H. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.3.927 · Cited by 742
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennetzen, J. L., & Hall, B. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3026-3031
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1603411458
- Cited by
- 1,580
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Codon selection in yeast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81068-2
- The paper
- Bennetzen, J. L., & Hall, B. D. (1982). Codon selection in yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81068-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.