Cited by 742RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: Natural selection and translational accuracy

Open access
Akashi, H·1994·Genetics

Abstract

I present evidence that natural selection biases synonymous codon usage to enhance the accuracy of protein synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Since the fitness cost of a translational misincorporation will depend on how the amino acid substitution affects protein function, selection for translational accuracy predicts an association between codon usage in DNA and functional constraint at the protein level. The frequency of preferred codons is significantly higher at codons conserved for amino acids than at nonconserved codons in 38 genes compared between D. melanogaster and Drosophila virilis or Drosophila pseudoobscura (Z = 5.93, P < 10(-6)). Preferred codon usage is also significantly higher in putative zinc-finger and homeodomain regions than in the rest of 28 D. melanogaster transcription factor encoding genes (Z = 8.38, P < 10(-6)). Mutational alternatives (within-gene differences in mutation rates, amino acid changes altering codon preference states, and doublet mutations at adjacent bases) do not appear to explain this association between synonymous codon usage and amino acid constraint.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/genetics/136.3.927

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akashi, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Akashi, H
Venue
Genetics
Published
1994-03-01
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
927-935
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2147126179
Cited by
742
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 36
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
synonymous codon usage, Drosophila melanogaster, translational accuracy, natural selection, amino acid conservation, zinc finger proteins, homeodomain transcription factor, transcription factors, mutational bias, Drosophila virilis, Drosophila pseudoobscura
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Codon, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Transcription Factors, Protein Biosynthesis, Genes, Insect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review