Cited by 207Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

Transport properties of ionomer composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells

Dimitrova, P, Friedrich, K.A, Vogt, B, Stimming, U·2002·Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-0728(02)01006-9

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimitrova, P., Friedrich, K. A., Vogt, B., & Stimming, U.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Stimming, U
Venue
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
532
Issue
1-2
Pages
75-83
ISSN
1572-6657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021695346
Cited by
207
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Keywords
direct methanol fuel cells, composite membranes, silica filler, proton conductivity, methanol crossover, water permeation, membrane thickness, water absorption, membrane modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review