Cited by 432Rabies epidemiology and controlVirology and Viral DiseasesAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology

Development of a fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test (FAVN test) for the quantitation of rabies-neutralising antibody

Cliquet, F., Aubert, M., Sagné, L.·1998·Journal of Immunological Methods

Abstract

A microtest named the FAVN test (fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test), which is an adaptation of the original rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) has been developed and evaluated. One hundred percent specificity was estimated using 414 sera from dogs sampled in rabies-free areas or from non-vaccinated animals. The accuracy as determined by the agreement between observed and expected values using sera of known titres was satisfactory. Serum samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated dogs (using sera with titres near 0.5 IU/ml) were assayed for rabies antibody by the FAVN test, the RFFIT and the mouse neutralisation test (MNT): comparative results obtained on the same sera with the three tests showed good agreement. Furthermore, distinguishing negative sera from positive sera with low titres is much easier with the FAVN test than with the RFFIT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00212-3

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-rabies serum antibodies were analyzed by FAVN test according to WHO protocol.

    “Anti-rabies serum antibodies were analyzed by FAVN test by Eurovir Hygiene-Institut, Luckenwalde, Germany according to WHO protocol [30].”
  • The RABV neutralization assay was conducted in a certified BSL-2 laboratory using the FAVN assay with WHO international standard immunoglobulin and naïve serum as positive and negative controls.

    “The RABV neutralization assay was conducted in a certified BSL-2 laboratory. Sera were analyzed for VNAs using the FAVN assay, with RABV (CVS-11 strain) as the test virus and BHK-21 cells as the host cells ( 52 ). The calibrated World Health Organization international standard immunoglobulin (second human rabies immunoglobulin preparation, National Institute for Standards and Control, Potters Bar,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cliquet, F., Aubert, M., & Sagné, L.
Corresponding author
Cliquet, F.
Venue
Journal of Immunological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
212
Issue
1
Pages
79-87
ISSN
0022-1759 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989888538
Cited by
432
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Immunological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Keywords
rabies, rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, antibody quantitation, dog vaccination, test specificity, diagnostic accuracy, serological diagnosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Dogs, Neutralization Tests, Rabies, Rabies virus, Reference Standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review