The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity
Open accessAbstract
In this study, a fluorometric method using alamarBlue has been developed for detecting cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. AlamarBlue is a non-toxic metabolic indicator of viable cells that becomes fluorescent upon mitochondrial reduction. Specific lysis of targets by effector cells is quantified by comparing the total number of viable cells in wells containing effector and targets together, with wells where target and effector cells were separately seeded. Cell-mediated cytotoxic activity by alloreactive T cells and natural killer cells has been detected using a novel application of the alamarBlue technique. The assay that we have developed to detect cell-mediated cytotoxicity is extremely sensitive and specific and requires a significant lower number of effector cells than the standard 51Cr assay. Since alamarBlue reagent is non-toxic to cells and the assay can be performed under sterile conditions, effector cells may be recovered at the end for further analysis or cell expansion, if desired. Direct comparison of cell-mediated cytotoxicity measured by the alamarBlue method with the standard 51Cr release assay revealed that the former method is as specific and more sensitive than the conventional assay. Moreover, very small inter and intra-assay variations have been observed for alamarBlue cytotoxicity assays. In conclusion, this study shows that the alamarBlue assay is an extremely sensitive, economical, simple and non-toxic procedure to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity that yields accurate results using a limited number of effector cells. Furthermore, since this assay is a one-step procedure, and does not involve any risk for the personnel, it may be useful to analyze automatically cell-mediated cytotoxicity in a large number of samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yang, W. S., & Stockwell, B. R. (2008) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.02.010 · Cited by 1,876
Dolma, S., Lessnick, S. L., Hahn, W. C., & Stockwell, B. R. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00050-3 · Cited by 1,446
O’Brien, P. J., Irwin, W., Diaz, D., Howard-Cofield, E., Krejsa, C. M., Slaughter, M. R., Gao, B., Kaludercic, N., Angeline, A., Bernardi, P., et al. (2006) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-006-0091-3 · Cited by 609
Al-Nasiry, S., Geusens, N., Hanssens, M., Luyten, C., & Pijnenborg, R. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem011 · Cited by 486
The xCELLigence System for Real-Time and Label-Free Monitoring of Cell Viability
Ke, N., Wang, X., Xu, X., & Abassi, Y. A. (2011) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-108-6_6 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Nociari, M. M., Shalev, A., Benias, P., & Russo, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Immunological Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 213
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-167
- ISSN
- 0022-1759 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986170848
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-1759(98)00028-3
- The paper
- Nociari, M. M., Shalev, A., Benias, P., & Russo, C. (1998). A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Journal of Immunological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1759(98)00028-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.