Cited by 249Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.

Wei, Binqing Q., Baase, Walter A., Weaver, Larry H., Matthews, Brian W., Shoichet, Brian K.·2002·Journal of Molecular Biology

DOI 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Prediction of interaction energies between ligands and their receptors remains a major challenge for structure-based inhibitor discovery. Much effort has been devoted to developing scoring schemes that can successfully rank the affinities of a diverse set of possible ligands to a binding site for which the structure is known. To test these scoring functions, well-characterized experimental systems can be very useful. Here, mutation-created binding sites in T4 lysozyme were used to investigate how the quality of atomic charges and solvation energies affects molecular docking. Atomic charges and solvation energies were calculated for 172,118 molecules in the Available Chemicals Directory using a semi-empirical quantum mechanical approach by the program AMSOL. The database was first screened against the apolar cavity site created by the mutation Leu99Ala (L99A). Compared to the electronegativity-based charges that are widely used, the new charges and desolvation energies improved ranking of known apolar ligands, and better distinguished them from more polar isosteres that are not observed to bind. To investigate whether the new charges had predictive value, the non-polar residue Met102, which forms part of the binding site, was changed to the polar residue glutamine. The structure of the resulting Leu99Ala and Met102Gln double mutant of T4 lysozyme (L99A/M102Q) was determined and the docking calculation was repeated for the new site. Seven representative polar molecules that preferentially docked to the polar versus the apolar binding site were tested experimentally. All seven bind to the polar cavity (L99A/M102Q) but do not detectably bind to the apolar cavity (L99A). Five ligand-bound structures of L99A/M102Q were determined by X-ray crystallography. Docking predictions corresponded to the crystallographic results to within 0.4A RMSD. Improved treatment of partial atomic charges and desolvation energies in database docking appears feasible and leads to better distinction of true ligands. Simple model binding sites, such as L99A and its more polar variants, may find broad use in the development and testing of docking algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules
Cornell, W. D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C. I., Gould, I. R., Merz, K. M., Ferguson, D. M., Spellmeyer, D. C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J. W., & Kollman, P. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00124a002 · Cited by 13,111
Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.
Kunkel, T. A. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.2.488 · Cited by 7,309
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
[19] Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection
Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D., & Zakour, R. A. (1987) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-x · Cited by 5,191
Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity—a rapid access to atomic charges
Gasteiger, J., & Marsili, M. (1980) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 · Cited by 4,157
How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules?
Wang, J., Cieplak, P., & Kollman, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/1096-987x(200009)21:12 · Cited by 4,048
Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter
Wiseman, T., Williston, S., Brandts, J. F., & Lin, L. (1989) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(89)90213-3 · Cited by 2,677
Analytical molecular surface calculation
Connolly, M. L. (1983) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889883010985 · Cited by 2,521
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,287
Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models
Sitkoff, D. F., Sharp, K. A., & Honig, B. H. (1994) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100058a043 · Cited by 2,160

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Rarey, 1999, The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein–ligand docking predictions, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 34, 17, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<17::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein−Ligand Complexes
Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051256o · Cited by 7,012
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications
Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H. Y., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1549 · Cited by 4,354
ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening
Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci049714+ · Cited by 4,058
Self-citation
ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone
Sterling, T., & Irwin, J. J. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00559 · Cited by 3,224
ZINC: A Free Tool to Discover Chemistry for Biology
Irwin, J. J., Sterling, T., Mysinger, M. M., Bolstad, E. S. D., & Coleman, R. G. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci3001277 · Cited by 2,611
Virtual screening of chemical libraries
Shoichet, B. K. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03197 · Cited by 1,425
Self-citation
Principles and Applications of Halogen Bonding in Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology
Wilcken, R., Zimmermann, M. O., Lange, A., Joerger, A. C., & Boeckler, F. M. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm3012068 · Cited by 1,364
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
Huang, N., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0608356 · Cited by 1,318
Self-citation
Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes
Lyu, J., Wang, S., Balius, T. E., Singh, I., Levit, A., Moroz, Y. S., O’Meara, M. J., Che, T., Algaa, E., Tolmachova, K., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9 · Cited by 998
Self-citation
Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities
Gilson, M. K., & Zhou, H. (2007) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132550 · Cited by 980
Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening
Bajorath, J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd941 · Cited by 935
DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance
Allen, W. J., Balius, T. E., Mukherjee, S., Brozell, S. R., Moustakas, D. T., Lang, P. T., Case, D. A., Kuntz, I. D., & Rizzo, R. C. (2015) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23905 · Cited by 870
Advances and Challenges in Protein-Ligand Docking
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11083016 · Cited by 666
Computations of Standard Binding Free Energies with Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Deng, Y., & Roux, B. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp807701h · Cited by 599
A practical guide to large-scale docking
Bender, B. J., Gahbauer, S., Luttens, A., Lyu, J., Webb, C. M., Stein, R. M., Fink, E. A., Balius, T. E., Carlsson, J., Irwin, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z · Cited by 546
“Atomic desolvation energies for ligand atoms are calculated during ligand building using AMSOL 111 and are included in the ligand conformer library.”
MethodSelf-citation
Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions.
Huang, S.-Y., Grinter, S. Z., & Zou, X. (2010) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp00151a · Cited by 508
Lead discovery using molecular docking
Shoichet, B. K., McGovern, S. L., Wei, B. Q., & Irwin, J. J. (2002) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00339-3 · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Assessing Scoring Functions for Protein−Ligand Interactions
Ferrara, P., Gohlke, H., Price, D. J., Klebe, G., & Brooks, C. L. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030489h · Cited by 488
Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks
Mobley, D. L., & Gilson, M. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033654 · Cited by 408
Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)
Hu, L., Benson, M. L., Smith, R. D., Lerner, M. G., & Carlson, H. A. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20512 · Cited by 328
Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges
Guedes, I. A., Pereira, F. S. S., & Dardenne, L. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01089 · Cited by 331
Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking
Mysinger, M. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100214a · Cited by 325
Self-citation
Identification of entacapone as a chemical inhibitor of FTO mediating metabolic regulation through FOXO1
Peng, S., Xiao, W., Ju, D., Sun, B., Hou, N., Liu, Q., Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Gao, C., Zhang, S., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau7116 · Cited by 321
On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations
Mobley, D. L., Chodera, J. D., & Dill, K. A. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2221683 · Cited by 316
ZINC-22─A Free Multi-Billion-Scale Database of Tangible Compounds for Ligand Discovery
Tingle, B. I., Tang, K. G., Castanon, M., Gutierrez, J. J., Khurelbaatar, M., Dandarchuluun, C., Moroz, Y. S., & Irwin, J. J. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01253 · Cited by 314
Predicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site
Mobley, D. L., Graves, A. P., Chodera, J. D., McReynolds, A. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Dill, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies: Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant
Deng, Y., & Roux, B. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct060037v · Cited by 292
Structure-based discovery of β 2 -adrenergic receptor ligands
Kolb, P., Rosenbaum, D. M., Irwin, J. J., Fung, J. J., Kobilka, B. K., & Shoichet, B. K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812657106 · Cited by 291
Self-citation
Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology
Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b02008 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Information Decay in Molecular Docking Screens against Holo, Apo, and Modeled Conformations of Enzymes
McGovern, S. L., & Shoichet, B. K. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0300330 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function
Hermann, J. C., Martí‐Arbona, R., Fedorov, A. A., Fedorov, E. V., Almo, S. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Raushel, F. M. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05981 · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Bespoke library docking for 5-HT2A receptor agonists with antidepressant activity
Kaplan, A. L., Confair, D. N., Kim, K., Barros-Álvarez, X., Rodriguiz, R. M., Ying, Y., Kweon, O. S., Che, T., McCorvy, J. D., Kamber, D. N., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05258-z · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Complementarity Between a Docking and a High-Throughput Screen in Discovering New Cruzain Inhibitors
Ferreira, R. S., Simeonov, A. M., Jadhav, A., Eidam, O., Mott, B. T., Keiser, M. J., McKerrow, J. H., Maloney, D. J., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100488w · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein–ligand binding
Huang, N., Kalyanaraman, C., Bernacki, K., & Jacobson, M. P. (2006) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b608269f · Cited by 244
Soft Docking and Multiple Receptor Conformations in Virtual Screening
Ferrari, A. M., Wei, B. Q., Costantino, L., & Shoichet, B. K. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049756p · Cited by 246
Self-citation
Protein–ligand binding with the coarse-grained Martini model
Souza, P. C. T., Thallmair, S., Conflitti, P., Ramírez-Palacios, C., Alessandri, R., Raniolo, S., Limongelli, V., & Marrink, ‪. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17437-5 · Cited by 246
Improved protein–ligand binding affinity prediction by using a curvature-dependent surface-area model
Cao, Y., & Li, L. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu104 · Cited by 237
Structure-Based Discovery of A 2A Adenosine Receptor Ligands
Carlsson, J., Yoo, L. S., Gao, Z.-G., Irwin, J. J., Shoichet, B. K., & Jacobson, K. A. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100240h · Cited by 233
Self-citation
Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
Coleman, R. G., Carchia, M., Sterling, T., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075992 · Cited by 229
Self-citation
Inhibition of α-amylase by polyphenolic compounds: Substrate digestion, binding interactions and nutritional intervention
Sun, L., Wang, Y., & Miao, M. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.003 · Cited by 225
An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2006) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20504 · Cited by 215
Lessons from the lysozyme of phage T4
Baase, W. A., Liu, L., Tronrud, D. E., & Matthews, B. W. (2010) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.344 · Cited by 199
Self-citation
Chapter 4 Alchemical Free Energy Calculations: Ready for Prime Time?
Shirts, M. R., Mobley, D. L., & Chodera, J. D. (2007) · Annual reports in computational chemistry · doi:10.1016/s1574-1400(07)03004-6 · Cited by 206
Diazepam-bound GABAA receptor models identify new benzodiazepine binding-site ligands
Richter, L., de Graaf, C., Sieghart, W., Varagić, Z., Mörzinger, M., de Esch, I. J. P., Ecker, G. F., & Ernst, M. C. (2012) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.917 · Cited by 200
Rescoring Docking Hit Lists for Model Cavity Sites: Predictions and Experimental Testing
Graves, A. P., Shivakumar, D. M., Boyce, S. E., Jacobson, M. P., Case, D. A., & Shoichet, B. K. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.049 · Cited by 197
Self-citation
Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site
Boyce, S. E., Mobley, D., Rocklin, G., Graves, A. P., Dill, K., & Shoichet, B. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.049 · Cited by 180
Self-citation
Testing a Flexible-receptor Docking Algorithm in a Model Binding Site
Wei, B. Q., Weaver, L. H., Ferrari, A. M., Matthews, B. W., & Shoichet, B. K. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.015 · Cited by 179
Self-citation
Fragment Based Drug Design: From Experimental to Computational Approaches
Kumar, A., Voet, A. R. D., & Zhang, K. Y. J. (2012) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986712803530467 · Cited by 174
Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition
Wereszczynski, J., & McCammon, J. (2011) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics (print) · doi:10.1017/s0033583511000096 · Cited by 152
Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for Estimation of Protein−Ligand Binding Affinities
Gallicchio, E., Lapelosa, M., & Levy, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct1002913 · Cited by 158
Towards Accurate Free Energy Calculations in Ligand Protein-Binding Studies
Steinbrecher, T. B., & Labahn, A. (2010) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986710790514453 · Cited by 159
Applications of large-scale density functional theory in biology
Cole, D. J., & Hine, N. D. M. (2016) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/39/393001 · Cited by 159
Incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery.
Fischer, M., Coleman, R. G., Fraser, J. S., & Shoichet, B. K. (2014) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1954 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins
Fan, H., Irwin, J. J., Webb, B. M., Klebe, G., Shoichet, B. K., & Sali, A. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9003706 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks
Stein, R. M., Ying, Y., Balius, T. E., O’Meara, M. J., Lyu, J., Young, J., Tang, K. G., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00598 · Cited by 143
Self-citation
Inclusion of Solvation and Entropy in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein−Ligand Interactions
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9002987 · Cited by 143
Docking Screens: Right for the Right Reasons?
Kolb, P., & Irwin, J. J. (2009) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/156802609789207091 · Cited by 131
Virtual Screening against Metalloenzymes for Inhibitors and Substrates
Irwin, J. J., Raushel, F. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi050801k · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions: a critical perspective
Schulz‐Gasch, T., & Ståhl, M. (2004) · Drug Discovery Today Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.08.004 · Cited by 127
Recent Theoretical and Computational Advances for Modeling Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities
Gallicchio, E., & Levy, R. (2011) · Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386485-7.00002-8 · Cited by 112
Binding Estimation after Refinement, a New Automated Procedure for the Refinement and Rescoring of Docked Ligands in Virtual Screening
Rastelli, G., Degliesposti, G., Río, A. D., & Sgobba, M. (2009) · Chemical Biology & Drug Design · doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00780.x · Cited by 118
Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics
Wang, K., Chodera, J., Yang, Y., & Shirts, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-013-9689-8 · Cited by 115
Novel Ligands for a Purine Riboswitch Discovered by RNA-Ligand Docking
Daldrop, P., Reyes, F. E., Robinson, D. A., Hammond, C. M., Lilley, D. M. J., Batey, R., & Brenk, R. (2011) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.12.020 · Cited by 111
Mapping the Hydration Dynamics of Ubiquitin
Nucci, N. V., Pometun, M. S., & Wand, A. J. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja202033k · Cited by 109
Decoys Selection in Benchmarking Datasets: Overview and Perspectives
Réau, M. F., Langenfeld, F., Zagury, J., Lagarde, N., & Montès, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00011 · Cited by 118
One Scaffold, Three Binding Modes: Novel and Selective Pteridine Reductase 1 Inhibitors Derived from Fragment Hits Discovered by Virtual Screening
Mpamhanga, C. P., Spinks, D., Tulloch, L. B., Shanks, E. J., Robinson, D. A., Collie, I. T., Fairlamb, A. H., Wyatt, P. G., Frearson, J. A., Hunter, W. N., et al. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm900414x · Cited by 105
Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors
Ferrari, A. M., Degliesposti, G., Sgobba, M., & Rastelli, G. (2007) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.08.019 · Cited by 105
Decoys for Docking
Graves, A. P., Brenk, R., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0491187 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Structure-based discovery of conformationally selective inhibitors of the serotonin transporter
Singh, I., Seth, A., Billesbølle, C. B., Bráz, J. M., Rodriguiz, R. M., Roy, K., Bekele, B., Craik, V., Huang, X., Boytsov, D., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.010 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Free-energy calculations in structure-based drug design
Shirts, M. R., Mobley, D. L., & Brown, S. P. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511730412.007 · Cited by 100
Halogenated Benzenes Bound within a Non-polar Cavity in T4 Lysozyme Provide Examples of I⋯S and I⋯Se Halogen-bonding
Liu, L., Baase, W. A., & Matthews, B. W. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.086 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Structure-based Inhibitor Discovery against Adenylyl Cyclase Toxins from Pathogenic Bacteria That Cause Anthrax and Whooping Cough
Soelaiman, S., Wei, B. Q., Bergson, P., Lee, Y., Shen, Y., Mrksich, M., Shoichet, B. K., & Tang, W. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m301232200 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Site-Specific Hydration Dynamics of Globular Proteins and the Role of Constrained Water in Solvent Exchange with Amphiphilic Cosolvents
King, J. T., Arthur, E. J., Brooks, C. L., & Kubarych, K. J. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp300835k · Cited by 80
Identification of Protein–Ligand Binding Sites by the Level-Set Variational Implicit-Solvent Approach
Guo, Z., Li, B., Cheng, L., Zhou, S., McCammon, J. A., & Che, J. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct500867u · Cited by 80
Sensitivity in Binding Free Energies Due to Protein Reorganization
Lim, N. M., Wang, L., Abel, R., & Mobley, D. L. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00532 · Cited by 73
Hydrogen Bonding of 1,2-Azaborines in the Binding Cavity of T4 Lysozyme Mutants: Structures and Thermodynamics
Lee, H., Fischer, M. M., Shoichet, B. K., & Liu, S. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b06566 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Identification of new drug-like compounds from millets as Xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitors for treatment of Hyperuricemia: A molecular docking and simulation study
Pathak, R. K., Gupta, A., Shukla, R., & Baunthiyal, M. (2018) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.05.015 · Cited by 75
Life Beyond Kinases: Structure-Based Discovery of Sorafenib as Nanomolar Antagonist of 5-HT Receptors
Lin, X., Huang, X.-P., Chen, G., Whaley, R., Peng, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, G., Wang, S. X., Wang, S., Roth, B. L., et al. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300338m · Cited by 73
Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models
Cappel, D., Hall, M. L., Lenselink, E. B., Beuming, T., Qi, J., Bradner, J. E., & Sherman, W. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00362 · Cited by 71
Structure-based discovery of selective positive allosteric modulators of antagonists for the M 2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor
Korczynska, M., Clark, M. J., Valant, C., Xu, J., Moo, E. V., Albold, S., Weiss, D. R., Torosyan, H., Huang, W., Kruse, A. C., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1718037115 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Systematic Evaluation of Counterpoise Correction in Density Functional Theory
Gray, M., Bowling, P. E., & Herbert, J. M. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00883 · Cited by 68
Probing Molecular Docking in a Charged Model Binding Site
Brenk, R., Vetter, S. W., Boyce, S. E., Goodin, D. B., & Shoichet, B. K. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.034 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Conformational Transitions and Convergence of Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
Lapelosa, M., Gallicchio, E., & Levy, R. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200684b · Cited by 60
Escape of a Small Molecule from Inside T4 Lysozyme by Multiple Pathways
Nunes‐Alves, A., Zuckerman, D. M., & Arantes, G. M. (2018) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.014 · Cited by 59
Binding-Site Assessment by Virtual Fragment Screening
Huang, N., & Jacobson, M. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010109 · Cited by 60
Electrostatic embedding in large-scale first principles quantum mechanical calculations on biomolecules
Fox, S. J., Pittock, C., Fox, T., Tautermann, C. S., Malcolm, N. O. J., & Skylaris, C. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3665893 · Cited by 60
A structure-based strategy to identify new molecular scaffolds targeting the bacterial ribosomal A-site
Foloppe, N., Chen, I., Davis, B. J., Hold, A., Morley, D., & Howes, R. (2004) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2003.12.023 · Cited by 59
De Novo Design of Protein Kinase Inhibitors by in Silico Identification of Hinge Region-Binding Fragments
Urich, R., Wishart, G., Kiczun, M., Richters, A., Tidten, N., Rauh, D., Sherborne, B. S., Wyatt, P. G., & Brenk, R. (2013) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb300729y · Cited by 54
Homologous ligands accommodated by discrete conformations of a buried cavity
Merski, M., Fischer, M. M., Balius, T. E., Eidam, O., & Shoichet, B. K. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1500806112 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Engineering a model protein cavity to catalyze the Kemp elimination
Merski, M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208076109 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Density functional theory calculations on entire proteins for free energies of binding: Application to a model polar binding site
Fox, S., Dziedzic, J., Fox, T., Tautermann, C., & Skylaris, C.-K. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24686 · Cited by 43
Protein–ligand free energies of binding from full-protein DFT calculations: convergence and choice of exchange–correlation functional
Gundelach, L., Fox, T., Tautermann, C. S., & Skylaris, C. (2021) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d1cp00206f · Cited by 50
Structure-Based Discovery of Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp14 N7-Methyltransferase
Singh, I., Li, F., Fink, E. A., Chau, I., Li, A. S. M., Rodríguez‐Hernández, A., Glenn, I., Belinchón, F. J. Z., Rodriguez, M. L., Devkota, K., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02120 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
An effective docking strategy for virtual screening based on multi-objective optimization algorithm
Li, H., Zhang, H., Zheng, M., Luo, J., Kang, L., Liu, X., Wang, X., & Jiang, H. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-58 · Cited by 50
Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions.
Huang, N., & Jacobson, M. P. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 48
In Silico Identification of Mimicking Molecules as Defense Inducers Triggering Jasmonic Acid Mediated Immunity against Alternaria Blight Disease in Brassica Species
Pathak, R. K., Baunthiyal, M., Shukla, R., Pandey, D., Taj, G., & Kumar, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00609 · Cited by 46
Large‐scale DFT calculations in implicit solvent—A case study on the T4 lysozyme L99A/M102Q protein
Dziedzic, J., Fox, S. J., Fox, T., Tautermann, C. S., & Skylaris, C. (2012) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24075 · Cited by 45
Recent Advances in Computer-Aided Drug Design as Applied to Anti-Influenza Drug Discovery
Mallipeddi, P. L., Kumar, G., White, S. W., & Webb, T. R. (2014) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026614666140929153812 · Cited by 44
Lipids Regulate Lck Protein Activity through Their Interactions with the Lck Src Homology 2 Domain
Sheng, R., Jung, D.-J., Silkov, A., Kim, H., Singaram, I., Wang, Z.-G., Xin, Y., Kim, E., Park, M.-J., Thiagarajan-Rosenkranz, P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.720284 · Cited by 43

Authors: Wei, B. Q., Baase, W. A., Weaver, L. H., Matthews, B. W., & Shoichet, B. K.
Affiliations: Northwestern University (US)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author: Matthews, Brian W.
Shoichet, Brian K.
ORCID: Wei, Binqing Q.
Matthews, Brian W.
Shoichet, Brian K.
Venue: Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2002-09
Volume: 322
Issue: 2
Pages: 339-355
ISSN: 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5
OpenAlex: W1980285986
Cited by: 237
References: 70
Citations by year: 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI: 8.40
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Northwestern University
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-21967, GM59957, R01GM059957, R01GM021967)
Topics: Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords: molecular docking, scoring functions, T4 lysozyme, atomic charges, desolvation energy, solvation energy, ligand binding affinity, partial atomic charges, ligand ranking
MeSH terms: Algorithms, Binding Sites, Calorimetry, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Muramidase, Mutation, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Software, Databases, Factual, Bacteriophage T4, Crystallography, X-Ray, Amino Acid Substitution, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks