Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solvation Effects and Driving Forces for Protein Thermodynamic and Kinetic Cooperativity: How Adequate is Native-centric Topological Modeling?

Open access
Kaya, Hüseyin, Chan, Hue Sun·2003·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

What energetic and solvation effects underlie the remarkable two-state thermodynamics and folding/unfolding kinetics of small single-domain proteins? To address this question, we investigate the folding and unfolding of a hierarchy of continuum Langevin dynamics models of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. We find that residue-based additive Gō-like contact energies, although native-centric, are by themselves insufficient for protein-like calorimetric two-state cooperativity. Further native biases by local conformational preferences are necessary for protein-like thermodynamics. Kinetically, however, even models with both contact and local native-centric energies do not produce simple two-state chevron plots. Thus a model protein's thermodynamic cooperativity is not sufficient for simple two-state kinetics. The models tested appear to have increasing internal friction with increasing native stability, leading to chevron rollovers that typify kinetics that are commonly referred to as non-two-state. The free energy profiles of these models are found to be sensitive to the choice of native contacts and the presumed spatial ranges of the contact interactions. Motivated by explicit-water considerations, we explore recent treatments of solvent granularity that incorporate desolvation free energy barriers into effective implicit-solvent intraprotein interactions. This additional feature reduces both folding and unfolding rates vis-à-vis that of the corresponding models without desolvation barriers, but the kinetics remain non-two-state. Taken together, our observations suggest that interaction mechanisms more intricate than simple Gō-like constructs and pairwise additive solvation-like contributions are needed to rationalize some of the most basic generic protein properties. Therefore, as experimental constraints on protein chain models, requiring a consistent account of protein-like thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity can be more stringent and productive for some applications than simply requiring a model heteropolymer to fold to a target structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01434-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Kaya, H., & Chan, H. S.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
326
Issue
3
Pages
911-931
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141570358
Cited by
172
References
3
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solvation Effects and Driving Forces for Protein Thermodynamic and Kinetic Cooperativity: How Adequate is Native-centric Topological Modeling? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01434-1
The paper
Kaya, H., & Chan, H. S. (2003). Solvation Effects and Driving Forces for Protein Thermodynamic and Kinetic Cooperativity: How Adequate is Native-centric Topological Modeling? Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01434-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.