Cited by 87Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dependence of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Recovery from Desensitization on the Duration of Agonist Exposure

Reitstetter, Raven, Lukas, Ronald J., Gruener, Raphael·1999·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

When subjected to prolonged exposure to nicotinic agonists, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors undergo desensitization, resulting in an inactive receptor that does not allow for the passage of ions. The induction of desensitization of diverse nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in muscle, ganglia, or brain is likely to play important modulatory roles in synaptic transmission. Furthermore, nicotinic receptor desensitization may contribute to behavioral changes in humans or animals subjected to prolonged nicotine exposure pharmacologically or through the use of tobacco products. We investigated the recovery from desensitization of muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in TE671/RD cells induced by exposure to acetylcholine or nicotine. Rates of recovery from desensitization are dependent on the length of agonist exposure and on the agonist used to induce desensitization. Increasing the time of exposure results in an increase in the time constant of recovery for both agonists. The recovery from nicotine-induced desensitization is consistently faster than the recovery from acetylcholine-induced desensitization regardless of whether nicotine or acetylcholine is used to assess levels of desensitization. These findings suggest the existence of more than one state of receptor desensitization and that nicotinic agonists vary in their efficiency of inducing receptors to states of differing depths of desensitization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)38184-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reitstetter, R., Lukas, R. J., & Gruener, R.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Gruener, Raphael
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
289
Issue
2
Pages
656-660
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1948817653
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor desensitization, recovery from desensitization, nicotine, acetylcholine, synaptic transmission, tobacco use
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Cell Line, Ion Channels, Muscles, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Time Factors, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review