The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY AND ABUSE POTENTIAL OF N-ALLYLNOROXYMORPHONE (NALOXONE)
Abstract
The narcotic antagonist naloxone was studied in man to determine if it produced behavioral effects and physical dependence and if it substituted for morphine in morphine-dependent subjects. When compared to placebo in 12 subjects in a cross-over design, no or little activity was demonstrated for naloxone while, in contrast, the narcotic antagonists, nalorphine and levallorphan, constricted pupils, produced responses on the subject9s and observer9s single-dose opiate questionnaires and produced psychotomimetic and sedative-like responses in a "subjective drug effect" questionnaire. In 10 subjects, naloxone administered 1, 2 and 4 hr before a test dose of morphine antagonized the effects of morphine. In morphine-dependent subjects, naloxone was 7 times as potent as nalorphine in precipiting abstinence. In three subjects, no behavioral or physiologic changes were observed during chronic administration and withdrawal of naloxone; however, the ability of naioxone to antagonize the effects of a test dose of morphine persisted. It is concluded that naloxone does not have abuse potential of the morphine type since it does not produce subjective effects or physical dependence and precipitates abstinence in morphine-dependent subjects. Further, naloxone is distinguished from the narcotic antagonists, nalorphine, levallorphan and cyclazocine, in that it does not constrict pupils or produce subjective effects, physical dependence or tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hökfelt, T., Ljungdahl, A., Terenius, L., Elde, R., & Nilsson, G. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.7.3081 · Cited by 887
Jasinski, D. R. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280111012 · Cited by 782
Self-citationAGA Institute Review of Endoscopic Sedation
Cohen, L. B., DeLegge, M. H., Aisenberg, J., Brill, J. V., Inadomi, J. M., Kochman, M. L., & Piorkowski, J. D. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.002 · Cited by 484
KOSTERLITZ, H. W., & WATT, A. J. (1968) · British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00988.x · Cited by 388
Naloxone dosage for opioid reversal: current evidence and clinical implications
Rzasa Lynn, R., & Galinkin, J. (2018) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098617744161 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Jasinski, D. R., Martin, W. R., & Haertzen, C. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1967-08
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 420-426
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162737073
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY AND ABUSE POTENTIAL OF N-ALLYLNOROXYMORPHONE (NALOXONE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)27721-7
- The paper
- Jasinski, D. R., Martin, W. R., & Haertzen, C. A. (1967). THE HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY AND ABUSE POTENTIAL OF N-ALLYLNOROXYMORPHONE (NALOXONE). The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)27721-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.