The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for sigma opioid receptor: binding of [3H]SKF-10047 to etorphine-inaccessible sites in guinea-pig brain.
Abstract
A portion of the specific binding of tritiated SKF-10047 to the guinea-pig brain suspension of the particulate fraction is not inhibited by the strong narcotic analgesic l-etorphine. The binding properties of these etorphine-inaccessible (EI) sites were examined. The specific binding of [3H]SKF-10047 to the EI sites is saturable. Scatchard analysis of the saturation curve revealed a single class of binding sites with apparent Kd of 252 nM and an estimated Bmax of 663 fmol/mg of protein. The EI binding was reduced by heat treatment, trypsin digestion and phospholipase C digestion. The presence of sodium ions slightly increased specific EI binding. Lithium ion increased the EI binding by about 38% at the optimal concentration of 1 mM. Divalent cations such as Mg++, Ca++ and Mn++ reduced EI binding. Morphine-like drugs such as morphine, levorphanol and naltrexone were poor inhibitors for the EI binding, whereas opioid derivatives such as pentazocine, dextrallorphan, cyclazocine, SKF-10047 and dextrorphan were potent inhibitors. Nonopioid drugs such as haloperidol, imipramine, pimozide and propranolol were also potent inhibitors of the EI binding. Distribution of the EI sites in brain was different from that of the mu receptor: highest concentration of EI sites was found in brainstem, midbrain and cerebellum, whereas lower concentrations were found in striatum and cortex. It is suggested that EI sites are not mu receptors but may represent sigma receptors in the central nervous system, mediating psychotomimetic effects of several opioids and other drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hayashi, T., & Su, T.-P. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.036 · Cited by 1,826
Self-citationThe pharmacology of sigma-1 receptors.
Maurice, T., & Su, T.-P. (2009) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.07.001 · Cited by 654
Self-citationMonnet, F. P., Mahé, V, Robel, P., & Baulieu, E. E. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.9.3774 · Cited by 429
Tam, S. W., & Cook, L. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.17.5618 · Cited by 349
Hellewell, S. B., & Bowen, W. D. (1990) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)91143-5 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, T. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 284-290
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128754068
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for sigma opioid receptor: binding of [3H]SKF-10047 to etorphine-inaccessible sites in guinea-pig brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)33330-6
- The paper
- Su, T. P. (1982). Evidence for sigma opioid receptor: binding of [3H]SKF-10047 to etorphine-inaccessible sites in guinea-pig brain. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)33330-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.