The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extracellular adenosine concentrations in hippocampal brain slices and the tonic inhibitory modulation of evoked excitatory responses.
Abstract
Because adenosine is taken up rapidly and metabolized by brain tissue, it has been difficult to establish its true pharmacological potency and, for similar reasons, to determine the basal extracellular concentrations of adenosine in brain. In the present studies, we used several independent pharmacological approaches to estimate these parameters, using the adenosine-mediated inhibition of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential evoked in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices as the biological response. The experiments used dipyridamole and S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine to inhibit adenosine uptake, competitive adenosine receptor antagonists to shift adenosine dose response curves to the right, and corrected for the effect of endogenous adenosine on dose-response curves. These approaches suggested that the EC50 for adenosine for depressing field excitatory postsynaptic potentials is in the range of 600 to 760 nM. Basal extracellular adenosine concentrations in brain slices were then estimated from the responses induced by superfusion with adenosine receptor antagonists. The estimates for the mean endogenous extracellular adenosine concentrations were in the range of 140 to 200 nM, although there was substantial variation in estimates for individual slices. These values fall within the range of estimated extracellular concentrations of adenosine in intact brain based on microdialysis studies, but are significantly below those estimated using biochemical techniques for measurement of total adenosine in brain tissue; this suggests that a substantial fraction of tissue adenosine is in a compartment that does not communicate directly with the extracellular space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role and Regulation of Adenosine in the Central Nervous System
Dunwiddie, T. V., & Masino, S. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.31 · Cited by 1,632
Self-citationCellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Cunha, R. A. (2001) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/s0197-0186(00)00034-6 · Cited by 631
Synapse-specific astrocyte gating of amygdala-related behavior
Martin-Fernandez, M., Jamison, S., Robin, L. M., Zhao, Z., Martin, E. D., Aguilar, J., Benneyworth, M. A., Marsicano, G., & Araque, A. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4649 · Cited by 345
Cholinergic and Adenosinergic Modulation of Synaptic Release
Yang, D., Ding, C., Qi, G., & Feldmeyer, D. (2021) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.06.006 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunwiddie, T. V., & Diao, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 537-545
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2213019609
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracellular adenosine concentrations in hippocampal brain slices and the tonic inhibitory modulation of evoked excitatory responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)38968-8
- The paper
- Dunwiddie, T. V., & Diao, L. (1994). Extracellular adenosine concentrations in hippocampal brain slices and the tonic inhibitory modulation of evoked excitatory responses. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)38968-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.