The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Five-year follow-up for adverse outcomes in males with at least minimally positive angiograms: importance of “denial” in assessing psychosocial risk factors
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test the role of "denial" (spouse/friend minus self-ratings on parallel versions of the same questionnaire) in diluting the predictive value of emotional distress for cardiac events (deaths, new MIs, and/or revascularizations). One hundred forty-four men with no history of prior revascularization who had at least minimally positive diagnostic coronary angiograms, and someone they selected as "someone who knows you well," completed parallel versions of the Ketterer Stress Symptom Frequency Checklist (KSSFC). They were followed up by phone an average of 59.7 months after recruitment. Length of follow-up, baseline cardiac risk factors, and a number of baseline-obtained psychosocial risk factors were tested as prospective predictors of combined events (death by any cause, new MIs, and/or revascularizations) and current anginal frequency. Only spouse/friend observed anxiety on the KSSFC predicted current anginal frequency (p = 0.001). On the self-report version of the KSSFC, patients with one or more events reported less anger (p = 0.031), depression (p = 0.008), and anxiety (p = 0.003). These results may be attributable to "denial" because there were no differences in spouse/friend ratings, and difference scores (spouse/friend minus patient) on the KSSFC scales, particularly anger, were also related to events: AIAI (p = 0.002); depression (p = 0.063); and anxiety (p = 0.010). Denial may be a major limiting factor in accurately assessing emotional distress in cardiac populations, and may help account for a number of the previous findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“or with 5-year [170]”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [170]
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Zipes, D. P., & Wellens, H. J. J. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.21.2334 · Cited by 2,744
Proposed hostility and Pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI.
Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0060667 · Cited by 1,489
The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis.
Suls, J. M., & Fletcher, B. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.249 · Cited by 1,224
The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis.
Suls, J. M., & Fletcher, B. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.249 · Cited by 885
Hostility, CHD Incidence, and Total Mortality: A 25-Year Follow-Up Study of 255 Physicians
Barefoot, J. C., Dahlstrom, G. W., & Williams, R. B. (1983) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-198303000-00008 · Cited by 866 · cited 2×
“Controlled retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional studies have implicated depression [1–3], anxiety [3–6], and anger [7–10] as strong predictors of adverse out-”
BackgroundMethodThe Cook-Medley hostility scale: item content and ability to predict survival.
Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Williams, R. B. (1989) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-198901000-00005 · Cited by 825 · cited 2×
“The Barefoot subscales [19] were scored from the Cook–Medley Scale: Cynicism, Hostile Attributes, Hostile Affects, Aggressive Responding, Social Avoidance, and Other.”
MethodTHE RELATIONSHIP OF PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS TO CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN THE FRAMINGHAM STUDY
Haynes, S., Levine, S., Scotch, N. A., Feinleib, M., & Kannel, W. B. (1978) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112556 · Cited by 800
Triggering of Acute Myocardial Infarction Onset by Episodes of Anger
Mittleman, M. A., Maclure, M., Sherwood, J. B., Mulry, R. P., Tofler, G. H., Jacobs, S. C., Friedman, R. B., Benson, H., & Muller, J. E. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1720 · Cited by 705
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Frasure-Smith, 1995, The impact of negative emotions on prognosis following myocardial infarction, Health Psych, 14, 388, 10.1037/0278-6133.14.5.388 · DOI
- Ketterer, 1994, A randomly-assigned, controlled pilot study of triaging and psychiatric consultation in acute myocardial infarction, Psychosom Med, 56, 173
- Burg, 1995, Anger, hostility and coronary heart disease, Mind/Body Med, 1, 159
- Helmers, 1995, Defensive hostility, Health Psych, 14, 202, 10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.202 · DOI
- CASS Principal Investigators Associates, 1981, The National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute Coronary Artery Surgery Study, Circulation, 63, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Depression as a predictor for coronary heart disease
Rugulies, R. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00439-7 · Cited by 1,110
Suls, J., & Bunde, J. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.260 · Cited by 878
The Association of Anger and Hostility With Future Coronary Heart Disease
Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.044 · Cited by 774
Roest, A. M., Martens, E. J., Denollet, J., & de Jonge, P. (2010) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181dbff97 · Cited by 388
“However, others did not find a relationship between anxiety and cardiac and all-cause mortality (20–23) or even found a protective impact of anxiety on all-cause death, recurrent MI, and revascularization (24,25).”
BackgroundDenollet, J. (2000) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00177-x · Cited by 378
Metadata
- Authors
- Ketterer, M. W., Huffman, J., Lumley, M. A., Wassef, S., Gray, L., Kenyon, L., Kraft, P., Brymer, J., Rhoads, K., Lovallo, W. R., & Goldberg, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Oklahoma City VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ketterer, Mark W.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-250
- ISSN
- 0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079791496
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 40 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- denial, emotional distress, psychosocial risk factors, coronary artery disease, cardiac events, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiac mortality, anxiety, depression, anger, self-report
- MeSH terms
- Angiography, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denial, Psychological, Depressive Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Videotape Recording, Myocardial Ischemia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
