Cited by 589Parental Involvement in EducationFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsDiverse Education Studies and Reforms

Trust and the family-school relationship examination of parent-teacher differences in elementary and secondary grades

Adams, Kimberly S, Christenson, Sandra L·2000·Journal of School Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-4405(00)00048-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, K. S., & Christenson, S. L.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Adams, Kimberly S
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
477-497
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015659558
Cited by
589
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Keywords
trust, school-family relations, parent-teacher relationships, school-family communication, elementary school, secondary schools, academic performance, suburban schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review