Cited by 294ZnO doping and propertiesSkin Protection and AgingCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Cerium oxide for sunscreen cosmetics

Yabe, Shinryo, Sato, Tsugio·2003·Journal of Solid State Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-4596(02)00139-1

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CeO2 is commercialised in some photoprotective formulations with silica coating, due to its high photocatalytic activity, which is responsible for oxidation and degradation of other formulations' components.

    “In fact, it is commercialised in some photoprotective formulations but with silica coating, due to its high photocatalytic activity, responsible for oxidation and degradation of other formulations’ components [128].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [128]

  • Doping CeO2 with Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions could reduce its photocatalytic activity and particle size without interfering with its photoprotective potential.

    “However, this gap could be ameliorated if CeO2 was doped with Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions, which could reduce its photocatalytic activity and particle size, without interfering with its photoprotective potential [128].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [128]

  • Coating CeO2 with amorphous silica decreases its photoprotective UV-shielding potential.

    “The coating with amorphous silica also decreases its photoprotective UV-shielding potential [128].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [128]

  • Cerium oxide (CeO2) has been suggested as a possible UV filter.

    “Cerium oxide (CeO2) was suggested as one possible UV filter.”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [128]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yabe, S., & Sato, T.
Affiliations
  • KOSÉ (Japan) (JP)
  • Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yabe, Shinryo
Venue
Journal of Solid State Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
171
Issue
1-2
Pages
7-11
ISSN
0022-4596 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066675940
Cited by
294
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Solid State Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › ZnO doping and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
cerium oxide, doped ceria, UV filters, sunscreen, ultrafine particles, fluorite structure, calcium doping, zinc doping, catalytic activity, UV absorption, visible transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review