The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANATOMIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EVOLUTION OF THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control, it never gained widespread popularity because of the major side effects of incontinence, impotence and excessive blood loss. The reason for this morbidity was a deficit in the understanding of the periprostatic anatomy. The evolution of the surgical technique for anatomic radical prostatectomy is described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beginning in 1974 anatomic observations in the operating room were used to clarify the anatomy of the dorsal vein complex, pelvic plexus, striated urethral sphincter and lateral pelvic fascia. These intraoperative observations were amplified using dissections in stillborns and step section whole mount adult cadaveric studies. RESULTS: Armed with improved information about the periprostatic anatomy, an anatomical approach to radical prostatectomy was developed. This surgical technique has improved surgical exposure, lowered blood loss, reduced urinary incontinence, made it possible to preserve potency and provided excellent cancer control. CONCLUSIONS: With the reduction in morbidity, radical prostatectomy today is an ideal treatment for the cure of prostate cancer in a patient who is curable and who is going to live long enough to need to be cured. Also the widespread application of radical prostatectomy has provided tissue and valuable pathological information that has galvanized research in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates
Center, M. M., Jemal, A., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Ward, E., Ferlay, J., Brawley, O., & Bray, F. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.054 · Cited by 1,521
WALSH, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67547-7 · Cited by 261
Self-citationErectile Aid Use by Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer
Bergman, J., Gore, J. L., Penson, D. F., Kwan, L., & Litwin, M. S. (2009) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.001 · Cited by 38
Bossio, J. A., Miller, F., O’Loughlin, J. I., & Brotto, L. A. (2019) · Sexual Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.03.001 · Cited by 18
Eastham, J. A. (2007) · Nature Clinical Practice Urology · doi:10.1038/ncpuro0916 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- WALSH, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 6 Part 2
- Pages
- 2418-2424
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2008385385
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANATOMIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EVOLUTION OF THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62202-x
- The paper
- WALSH, P. C. (1998). ANATOMIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EVOLUTION OF THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62202-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.