Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MANAGEMENT OF HORMONE REFRACTORY PROSTATE CANCER: CURRENT STANDARDS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

OH, WILLIAM K., KANTOFF, PHILIP W.·1998·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent advances in the biology and treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer are reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE literature search of secondary hormonal therapy and chemotherapy for hormone refractory prostate cancer was performed. Recent advances in the biology of hormone refractory prostate cancer, changes in the measurement of response to therapy, and testing of new drugs and combinations of drugs were reviewed. RESULTS: Historically the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer has been disappointing. Useful parameters to monitor clinical response have been lacking but perhaps more importantly a scarcity of apparently active drugs has contributed to these results. Recently several developments have improved the outlook for treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer. Recognition of antiandrogen withdrawal responses has had important ramifications for clinical trial interpretation and patient care. Secondary hormonal therapies, such as alternative antiandrogens and anti-adrenal agents, are well tolerated and can provide significant clinical benefits. Combining prostate specific antigen values with quality of life and measurable disease responses has made clinical trial end points more objective and more clinically relevant for the patient. Furthermore, a better understanding of the biology of hormone refractory prostate cancer, refinements in measuring response to treatment and availability of agents with proved palliative capabilities and/or generating greater than 50% response have all lead to improvements in treatment management. In 2 randomized studies mitoxantrone in combination with steroids has demonstrated significant palliative benefit compared with steroids alone. In phase II studies more than half of patients respond to estramustine combinations with vinblastine, etoposide or paclitaxel. Other novel combinations and new drugs currently are being tested. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances suggest that available therapies for hormone refractory prostate cancer can have a meaningful impact on the disease. Improving treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer remains an area of active investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62501-1

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
OH, W. K., & KANTOFF, P. W.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1998-10
Volume
160
Issue
4
Pages
1220-1229
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2016055442
Cited by
260
References
68
FWCI
20.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MANAGEMENT OF HORMONE REFRACTORY PROSTATE CANCER: CURRENT STANDARDS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62501-1
The paper
OH, W. K., & KANTOFF, P. W. (1998). MANAGEMENT OF HORMONE REFRACTORY PROSTATE CANCER: CURRENT STANDARDS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62501-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.