The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY: THE PREFERRED CHOICE? A COMPARISON TO OPEN ADRENALECTOMY
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compare the effectiveness and efficiency of laparoscopic adrenalectomy to open surgical management of adrenal disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 21 patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy between April 1996 and May 1997 with 17 patients who underwent open adrenalectomy between October 1994 and January 1996. Any patient suspected of having primary adrenal carcinoma and/or an adrenal lesion larger than 6 cm. was excluded from the study. RESULTS: Patient demographics were matched well. Mean laparoscopic surgical time was 79 minutes longer than for open surgery. After overcoming the learning curve, the surgical time decreased by 59 minutes in the last 10 laparoscopic adrenalectomies. All laparoscopic intraoperative complications were managed without the need for open surgical conversion. Postoperative characteristics demonstrated significant benefits in the laparoscopic group (p=0.001) with respect to days to return to full diet (1.7 versus 4.6), analgesic pain requirements and days of hospitalization (2.7 versus 6.2). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy offers significant postoperative benefits to patients with benign adrenal disease requiring surgical intervention. The surgical time is longer than that for open adrenalectomy but there was an encouraging reduction in time after overcoming the laparoscopic learning curve. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an excellent choice for tumors smaller than 6 cm. Its role for larger lesions and/or primary adrenal carcinoma is currently under investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Adrenocortical carcinoma: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment
NG, L., & LIBERTINO, J. M. (2003) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64023-2 · Cited by 423
Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies
Ramsay, C. R., Grant, A. M., Wallace, S. A., Garthwaite, P. H., Monk, A. F., & Russell, I. T. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5120 · Cited by 353
Assalia, A., & Gagner, M. (2004) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4738 · Cited by 308
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal masses: does size matter?
Castillo, O. A., Vitagliano, G., Secin, F. P., Kerkebe, M., & Arellano, L. (2008) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.019 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- WINFIELD, H. N., HAMILTON, B. D., BRAVO, E. L., & NOVICK, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-329
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1965289679
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY: THE PREFERRED CHOICE? A COMPARISON TO OPEN ADRENALECTOMY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62884-2
- The paper
- WINFIELD, H. N., HAMILTON, B. D., BRAVO, E. L., & NOVICK, A. C. (1998). LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY: THE PREFERRED CHOICE? A COMPARISON TO OPEN ADRENALECTOMY. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62884-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.